Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-03-11 06:26 pm
[ SECRET POST #2625 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2625 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 040 secrets from Secret Submission Post #375.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Canon Rant Thread
(Anonymous) 2014-03-11 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)(Moonlighting Syndrome is nonsense, btw. What kills shows is dumbass writers thinking that the fun character dynamic should disappear now that the main twosome are together, or that you can't have interesting contrasts and conflicts without the two being in open battle)
Fucking Voyager coulda been SO GOOD. I still like it, but the worship of Star Trek status quo kept it from going really fascinating places. (they've been stranded away from all support for years, why is everything still so CLEAN?? just to start)
Re: Canon Rant Thread
(Anonymous) 2014-03-12 12:01 am (UTC)(link)Re: Canon Rant Thread
Love it or hate it, they are both set in the Star Trek universe. Deep Space Nine showed some of the underbelly of that universe, but it still had a lot of the same things.
Re: Canon Rant Thread
(Anonymous) 2014-03-12 12:33 am (UTC)(link)don't get me wrong, I don't hate Voyager: I just thought it was so dissapointing that they gave it this cool and interesting concept (stranded light-years away from home) and then didn't really do anything with it. The essential optimism and professionalism was Star Trek, but what I always loved was the "To boldly go", the drive to go out and explore--whereas the primary precept of Voyager was returning home. IF they had kept the Star Trek atmosphere but adapted it to the setting--okay, maybe the ship is becoming patchy and jerry-rigged and a bit grubby, maybe we're moving away from the formal uniform to something more adapted to energy conservation, and maybe interpersonal relationships have to change because we're a community now more than just coworkers, but we can still be professionals dammit! Our ultimate goal may be Earth, but our primary focus is the joy of exploring a whole new area of space (it's about the journey more than the destination)--that was what I was really wanting from the beginning and I was sad to see never explored. (some of the tie-in novels did better, I thought....)
Re: Canon Rant Thread
(Anonymous) 2014-03-12 12:41 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Canon Rant Thread
(Anonymous) 2014-03-12 01:04 am (UTC)(link)Re: Canon Rant Thread
Re: Canon Rant Thread
(Anonymous) 2014-03-12 01:18 am (UTC)(link)Re: Canon Rant Thread
Re: Canon Rant Thread