Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-03-15 03:41 pm
[ SECRET POST #2629 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2629 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 071 secrets from Secret Submission Post #376.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 3 - too big ], [ 1 2 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2014-03-16 07:31 am (UTC)(link)Hey, I'm not the one saying magical Snow Queens follow real life science! And treating it like it's real history. Did you have Queen Elsa in your history class? I didn't. Why would it take someone with dark skin months? They could have magic flying ponies haul them there! Magic! They could teleport. Walk through a magic mirror. Be resurrected by the moon and fly there on a crooked stick, because magic! Not real. No need for "Well in the real world vitamin D!"
Re: DA
If one counts that brief cameo as an indicator that Tangled is in the same universe, the flower as a rare magical thing as well and a lot of Gothel's scare-mongering centred on the idea that people are greedy and want Rapunzel's rare magic. Not even Gothel had magic there, only Rapunzel, thanks to her mother drinking sunlight-flower-based medicine.
These POCs from way off south may not have all the flying ponies, magic mirrors or teleport there. The people who did make it to Elsa's coronation all had to come by ship, so they certainly didn't.
Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2014-03-16 08:11 am (UTC)(link)sooooo
Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2014-03-16 08:45 am (UTC)(link)Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2014-03-16 06:17 pm (UTC)(link)It's especially ridiculous to accuse Frozen of this when a) Disney actually has a decent track record of being racially diverse compared to some things. Aladdin, Lilo & Stitch, Brother Bear, Hunchback of Notre Dame, The Jungle Book, Pocahontas, Mulan, The Emperor's New Groove, Up (if you count Pixar), and The Princess and the Frog all have casts with either completely non-white casts or non-white main characters. Do some of these movies have issues? Yes! Could they do to make more movies that star non-white characters? Totally! But is Frozen racist because the main characters aren't white? NO. Also b) Frozen is probably the first Disney movie set in fantasy-Europe that actually acknowledges that non-white people exist and has several of them in the background of the ballroom scene.
Like, seriously. I'm not saying Frozen doesn't have issues. But it pisses me off that some people are singling it out and acting like it's actually racist (no, that would be something like the Natives in Peter Pan), just because it's about white people.
Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2014-03-16 06:34 pm (UTC)(link)Do I think saying the movie would be unrealistic if she weren't white because of vitamin D is racist? YES. If she were real, pale skin would absorb vitamin D better. She'd also probably fall over dead in five minutes because her waist is something like 6 inches around, and she'd look like some sort of strange nocturnal creature with her eyes taking up three fourths of her head. But those are totally cool and suspension of disbelief, BUT NOT DARK SKIN.
Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2014-03-17 06:54 am (UTC)(link)I can sort of see it in Frozen because of the concept art, which is a style consistent with storybooks from certain European regions, but that doesn't make it look less ridiculous in animation.