case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-03-19 06:48 pm

[ SECRET POST #2633 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2633 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 025 secrets from Secret Submission Post #376.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
cassandraoftroy: Chiana from Farscape, an alien with grayscale skin and hair (Default)

[personal profile] cassandraoftroy 2014-03-19 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm trying to think of a pairing that could be portmanteaued into "Challah."
loracarol: (to the front to the front)

[personal profile] loracarol 2014-03-20 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
Ummm.... Charmander/Alomomola or Galvantula? It's missing an "H", but...

Note, I don't actually know anything about Pokemon; for all I know, this might be physically impossible.

diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2014-03-20 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
It's not, sadly. None of those are in the same egg group.

Any of those combinations would still make more sense than Wailord/Skitty or Wailord/Dedenne
loracarol: (spg)

[personal profile] loracarol 2014-03-20 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
Damn.

I can't think of anything else, except Charming/Mulan, and if you got someone with an H name in there, you could use that as an excuse to drop the last N, but I can't think of anyone atm. |D
ozaline: (Default)

[personal profile] ozaline 2014-03-20 06:47 am (UTC)(link)
And relationships are only meaningful if they can produce children? hmmm?

(Anonymous) 2014-03-20 08:40 am (UTC)(link)
In Pokémon games? Where relationships between pokémon were only ever invented as a mechanic to create more pokémon? Yes. Stop reaching.
ozaline: (Default)

[personal profile] ozaline 2014-03-21 08:15 am (UTC)(link)
Ah well not every joke can be a winner.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2014-03-20 01:09 pm (UTC)(link)
In Pokemon, two Pokemon won't even mate if they're not in the same egg group. I assumed that's what was meant by loracarol when they said "physically possible". Maybe they meant it in a more literal way - if so, my bad.
ozaline: (Default)

[personal profile] ozaline 2014-03-21 08:17 am (UTC)(link)
Sorry I misread his original post when I made my joke. I do that occasionally.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2014-03-21 12:42 pm (UTC)(link)
oh, no worries :) I get where you're coming from since I also find the whole "a relationship isn't valid if you can't have kids!!!" thing to be really annoying and stupid.