case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-03-22 03:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #2636 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2636 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.
[Pinocchio]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 086 secrets from Secret Submission Post #377.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
intrigueing: (happy nine)

Re: Do you give old fictional works more of a pass than recent ones?

[personal profile] intrigueing 2014-03-22 10:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, IA. It bugs me when people phrase it like "oh obviously this book ought to be written differently for everyone's sake." (And hell, even if I would like a different style of writing better, when it comes to certain things like old translations of ancient epics and stuff, I wanna see something authentic, even if it's a pain in the ass, not an update!)

LOL I came up with "Hemingway" as verb during a creative writing class a while ago. The opposite is Dickensify (which IS NOT OBJECTIVELY BAD WHEN USED IN MODERATION YOU KNOW fuck stupid modern-obsessed unimaginative teachers *grumble grumble*...)
Edited 2014-03-22 22:32 (UTC)