case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-03-23 03:28 pm

[ SECRET POST #2637 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2637 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #377.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
world_eater: (Default)

[personal profile] world_eater 2014-03-24 02:49 am (UTC)(link)
your tone isn't harsh, but your "recommendation" is rude. there's a reason there's no way to say something like that and not sound like it.


it's also a bit curious that you equate hating something with not being informed about it.
Edited 2014-03-24 02:49 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2014-03-24 03:10 am (UTC)(link)
Well how informed are you about it? Have you watched the gameplay from start to finish? How familiar are you with South Park?

I'm sorry if I assumed you were not informed wrongly, but you were speaking in generalities and not specifics of the game or the series, and I'm seeing a lot of that going on in this thread for the sake of representation.

I am all for more female representation in games, I just don't think we should make the mistake of trying to back the wrong horse.
world_eater: (Default)

[personal profile] world_eater 2014-03-24 03:21 am (UTC)(link)
Are you kidding me right now? I'm telling you how rude you're being and you want to quiz me on me knowledge about the topic? And you're genuinely expecting everyone who wants to participate in the discussion to have played the entire game?

How much would you like me start questioning your authority on debating about game development? Because quite frankly, that is the only knowledge relevant for the discussion we are having. Because that is why I'm speaking in generalities. This game is not a special case just because it is a game about South Park. The game developers/publisher could have made a game with a playable female character, that is a fact. They made the decision not to do so. Do not absolve them of that decision out of some misguided reverence for the source material.
Edited 2014-03-24 03:21 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2014-03-24 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
Except it is relevant to the discussion, the game would not be received as a South Park game just because it has the label "South Park" attached to it. Every franchise has with it certain expectations that come with that franchise and that effects how creators will develop a story.

I would not call it a special case, and yes, they could have made a different story, but I highly doubt it'd be easy to make a story with both a male playable and female playable character. That is the issue. Not even so much that there couldn't be a female protagonist, but because I don't know that there could be one at the same time as the male one. The dialogue, story, and character reactions would all be different if the protagonist was female. This is how South Park runs.

You were responding to a secret and a comment that very much was talking about the rules of the South Park world. If you want to talk about gender inequalities in the gaming industry, go right ahead. But don't challenge specific games unless you know a bit about them.
world_eater: (Default)

[personal profile] world_eater 2014-03-24 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
Are you fucking kidding me right now.


Have you actually read my comments or are you arguing against some random strawman that you've thought yourself up?

(Anonymous) 2014-03-24 04:04 am (UTC)(link)
I read what you said and I agreed with certain points, I said as such. But I think it's a simplistic approach to just say, "But they could have just made an entirely different game!" when we're trying to have a discussion about the game at hand.

I also don't think it's helpful to go into media discussions where you haven't consumed the media and talk about how it should be changed. Critique of media doesn't work that way, you critique it after you've viewed it, not before.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-25 04:52 pm (UTC)(link)
WTH is wrong with you? You're being a mega asshole.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-26 09:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Just FYI (different anon) I stopped reading your comments at this point in the thread because you're being so reactionary and stupid. Chill out.