[ SECRET POST #2638 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2638 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #377.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

sa

[(Anonymous)]

suicide attempts are higher in women than men, as a total. men are only more likely to succeed.

objectification does hurt. but you have to analyse the consequences and consider the fact that women objectifying men doesn't hurt them, but rather patriarchal standards set by men themselves tend to leave many men with complexes. women don't have the institutional power to oppress men through objectification.

Re: sa

[(Anonymous)]

Feminists use patriarchy like zealots use God. No one can see it, but it is totally responsible for everything ever.

Re: sa

[(Anonymous)]

No one can see it? Must be nice to be a man. I see it all the time.

Re: sa

[(Anonymous)]

I AM a man and I see it all the time. But I do think that kyriarchy is a better model for understanding it.

Re: sa

[(Anonymous)]

Followup question, then: at what point do we decide that women do have institutional power? You would agree, I hope, that women have MORE power in society than they did fifty years ago? We're on the same page that that's a good thing, right? But it doesn't count yet, according to you. That's cool. At what point DOES it count? What's a metric we can hit?

nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

I would assume we would agree that women have institutional power when they are, y'know, the majority force in an institution of some kind (like the government, religion, media production, etc.). Which I think we can all acknowledge that they don't yet.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

Hey, women are over 50% of the population. If they ain't voting women into government and such, that is their own fault.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

Here's the thing about politics: you can't just waltz into it. There's a reason that our politicians (on a national level, at least) tend to be well-connected and somewhat wealthy.

Can't vote a woman in if there isn't a woman candidate, and the barriers to entry for prospective women candidates are still higher than they are for men. This is starting to change, obviously, as evidenced by the increased presence of women in politics, but we're not quite there yet.