case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-03-27 06:52 pm

[ SECRET POST #2641 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2641 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #377.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Is there a point to secrecy when I'm the only named poster who talks about my fandom?

(Anonymous) 2014-03-28 04:15 am (UTC)(link)
My overall impression has always been that the number of anons and lurkers here is a good deal larger than the number of regular posters, so I think the overall volume of posters/submitters is what you should be concerned with, not the number signed in. If there's enough of them, then all you need for plausible deniability is to be less dependable about commenting on every single MLP secret posted.