[ SECRET POST #2646 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2646 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Free! Iwatobi Swim Club]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Love so Life]


__________________________________________________



04.
[the last leg]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Karen Gillian/Doctor Who]


__________________________________________________



06.
[True Detective]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Yume Nikki]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Black Dagger Brotherhood Series]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Mass Effect]


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 040 secrets from Secret Submission Post #378.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[feotakahari]

Maybe another way to frame this would be in terms of war movies. On one level, you can look at a war movie and discuss how accurately it represents the things that happen during a war. On another level, you can discuss what the movie says about the war, and whether it supports or condemns it. I've heard it said that there are no neutral war movies, and to some extent, that's accurate--if you honestly represent what happens in a war, that's going to come off as anti-war to some degree. But it feels to me like it would be a stretch to describe a movie as anti-war just because it dispassionately portrays what happens in a war, when its purpose may be entirely different from praising or condemning war.

What you're saying is that if a work accurately portrays the fact that women are human beings with their own wants and desires, that's feminist. My argument with this is essentially semantic, but I think it's important as semantics go, because framing a work in a feminist light can obscure what it's really about (in Madoka's case, debt, obligation, and selflessness, which aren't framed in gendered terms here.)

[sarillia]

framing a work in a feminist light can obscure what it's really about (in Madoka's case, debt, obligation, and selflessness

Why can't you look at it both ways? Why does one obscure the other?

It's probably not relevant but I don't really see the series as feminist, but I'm not really understanding this argument against looking at it in those terms.

[feotakahari]

It would be great to talk about both, but that doesn't seem to be what most people do. I mentioned war stories before--when people talk about Ender's Game as an anti-war piece, they tend not to understand or care about what it says about moral relativism. I get frustrated to see more complicated ideas that takes more thought and effort to discuss constantly set aside in favor of messages that fit in a tweet or on a bumper sticker, so I tend to try to promote discussion of the more complicated ideas. I don't intend that to come at the expense of the simpler ideas, and I'm sorry if I came off that way.