Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-04-05 03:24 pm
[ SECRET POST #2650 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2650 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #379.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

TW: rape
(Anonymous) 2014-04-05 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)Well, now that so many people have pointed that way of looking at it out, I understand, but originally, it never crossed my mind that the articles were trying to show pity. I thought the point about the bright futures was expressing shame on them and pointing out that just because someone is successful and popular doesn't make them above committing a horrible crime. You know, in a dispelling of the often-used dismissal of rape allegations, "He couldn't have done it because I know him and he's such a great guy!"
But now I know I'm naive and delusional as always. I want to be mad, but I'm secretly afraid of what other true intentions I'm missing.
Re: TW: rape
Re: TW: rape
(Anonymous) 2014-04-05 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)Also I don't think it's a matter of being "naive" or "delusional" at all. Maybe more about cultural awareness and interpreting tone? Idk, I don't think it's necessarily bad that you missed that interpretation though.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-04-06 02:42 am (UTC)(link)Re: TW: rape