case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-04-14 06:41 pm

[ SECRET POST #2659 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2659 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #380.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
darkmanifest: (Default)

Re: Sasuga Jezebel

[personal profile] darkmanifest 2014-04-15 04:28 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah...can't say I like that. Not because lol men, but because the thought of it being mandatory for everyone in a very large and general pool of people to submit DNA samples without specific probable cause (they were seen with the victim shortly before/after the attack, they were present at the location where the assault took place and fit the description, something like that) deeply disturbs me, probably because I'm an extreme proponent of bodily autonomy and that is all kinds of "fuck no" for me. I'm also willing to bet that the mass subpoenas would have been a lot harder to get when dealing with a campus full of adults, but the rights of minors get trampled on as a rule.

Also, lol at "we'll totally get rid of the samples once the bad guy's caught, you can trust us". Hahaha okay.
Edited 2014-04-15 04:28 (UTC)

Re: Sasuga Jezebel

(Anonymous) 2014-04-15 05:38 am (UTC)(link)
This is exactly how I feel about it.

Re: Sasuga Jezebel

(Anonymous) 2014-04-15 05:47 am (UTC)(link)
I agree with basically everything you are saying. (Also, as a minor, thank you for mentioning that as a factor.)

Re: Sasuga Jezebel

(Anonymous) 2014-04-15 06:27 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, what makes me the most uncomfortable about this is the fact that they're all kids. I wouldn't agree with it if they were adults either, but we're talking about minors here.

Ask them to voluntarily submit DNA samples, sure. Hell, I wouldn't even care if they required fingerprinting. But I don't like the idea of forcing kids to submit DNA, especially when the only reason anyone has to suspect them is that they happen to go to the same school. It sets an extremely sketchy precedent.