Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-04-20 03:14 pm
[ SECRET POST #2665 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2665 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #381.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-04-20 07:36 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-04-20 07:49 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-04-20 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)(I have no idea if that actually happens in the book or not)
no subject
Overall, The Banned and the Banished is an unusual combination of high and dark fantasy. On the one hand, you've got a clear villain, an epic (some would say over-the-top) struggle for the fate of the world, and an unlikely band of heroes who're not quite sure they're up for all this. On the other hand, the villains and monsters are truly grotesque (one early villainess has the graphically detailed power to birth and unbirth venomous spiders), innocent people often die horribly, and the protagonists themselves often doubt whether they're doing the right thing. It's a surprisingly effective mix, allowing the reader to root for the heroes while providing genuine tension that they might screw up and get themselves or others killed.
Plenty of authors can create good characters. Relatively few authors can, in the span of a single short scene, introduce a new character to the established cast, make that character likable and interesting without overshadowing everyone else, and create reader investment in that character's fate. Of the authors I've read who can pull this off, Clemens is the third-best overall at doing it, the best who writes full-length novels, and the best who works with such a massive cast of characters. No matter what your tastes are, you're bound to find a character or three you'll love and adore, and while not all of them live long enough to get a full character arc, almost all of them are used well. (Only one of my favorites survived to the final battle, but I didn't even mind because they all died in such fitting ways.)
With all that praise, Clemens still has a weakness, and it's a serious one--he's incredibly hamhanded with what emotions he expects you to feel in certain scenes. At times it's like he's sitting right next to you, yelling into your ear "See, this is the sad scene! You're supposed to be sad! Are you sad yet?" Since the characters are so strong, you'll probably feel the expected emotions anyway, but it still gets a bit distracting.
Reading these books is a lot like watching a good Arnold Schwarzenegger movie--they're so hammy and cheesy they should be served on sliced bread, but that doesn't mean they aren't awesome. They'll make you laugh, make you cry, and maybe even make you think a little, and then you'll wipe your eyes, clear your brain, and get back to watching the carnage.
OP
(Anonymous) 2014-04-20 08:24 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
/nothing else to say though maybe will check it out
no subject
(Before anyone complains about the cover of book 2, it's a pretty accurate reproduction of how she's described in the book. This is the aforementioned villainess whose power is to give birth to spiders.)
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-04-21 02:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
OP
(Anonymous) 2014-04-20 08:27 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-04-20 07:41 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-04-20 08:24 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
OP
(Anonymous) 2014-04-20 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-04-20 09:20 pm (UTC)(link)Yes, I hate *creative spelling* a lot.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-04-20 21:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-04-20 23:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-04-20 23:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-04-20 23:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-04-21 00:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Still, it was a good dark fantasy. Hated the author's other work, though, Godslayer Chronicles, it was like the forebear of Game of Thrones-esque grittiness that plagues the genre today.
no subject
Also, Er'ril wasn't THAT bad of a character, at least in comparison to some I've seen. I mean, I've read the Species Imperative series. I have seriously thought "I liked this MMC better when he sparkled in sunlight." Er'ril just can't compete with that.
no subject
Er'ril wasn't an inherently bad character, I don't think, just annoying and hard to sympathize with for me, especially once that storyline with the female spider villain started. He had a good arc and if he hadn't started banging Elena I might have been able to like him.
Oh, nooo, don't tell me Czerneda pulled even worse shit with a main male character. Great, now I can't read Species Imperative, ever. Thanks for the warning, though.
(no subject)