Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-05-01 07:12 pm
[ SECRET POST #2676 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2676 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #382.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
Personally I don't think it's a particularly good or bad example of fantasy. It's got some good political intrigue, it's got dragons, there are complicated characters that you can root for or not. It's entertaining and it's got some things you can think about if you're inclined to deep interpretations. I don't really need it to be anything more than that.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-01 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)(Anon from comment below yours) It does get old as a rhetoric, I know. ;) I'd just like to point out though that a *lot* of GRRM's research for the books was on the War of the Roses, and the attitudes in the books really do reflect the attitudes of that time. Regardless of the fantasy elements. :)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-02 12:07 am (UTC)(link)Well my degree was History and my dissertation subject was set in the War of the Roses. Does that qualify me enough for you, or do I need to start pulling out historical resources?
Sorry to sound snarky, but yes - yes people do rely on common knowledge. However not everyone does.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-02 12:24 am (UTC)(link)It was pretty clear that you meant generally and not in every case.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-01 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)The books are a realistic portrayl of a country's descent into civil war and the huge toll and far reaching effects of that war. The sex and violence is very much representative of the attitudes of the time that GRRM used as a base - the English War of the Roses. The fantasy elements are the icing on the cake and weaved in pretty well.
The TV show by its very nature cannot portray all of the details that make the books so worthwhile. And when you boil the storyline down you lose a lot of the more indepth stuff, and end up with a handful of awesome characters and a lot of sex, nudity and violence. Plus its HBO, so you also get extra sex, violence and rape thrown in on top.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-02 05:23 am (UTC)(link)High fantasy is a genre placement, not an indicator of the quality of the work. There is a metric tonne of shitty high fantasy out there (and shitty urban fantasy, shitty low fantasy, shitty dark fantasy, etc.).
no subject
When someone says they're new to epic fantasy and want book recs, it's the same ol' Tolkien, David Eddings, Robert Jordan, Brandon Sanderson, etc. GoT is epic fantasy with complex politics, royalty, blood and gore and sex and it doesn't pull any punches.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-02 08:02 am (UTC)(link)no subject