[ SECRET POST #2686 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2686 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 059 secrets from Secret Submission Post #384.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Controversial opinions

[diet_poison]

stella_down, I feel like the context of the above comment was lost on you. It transitioned from an anon talking about responsibility to another anon deciding they support eugenics. Which is...no.

In seriousness, though, thanks for the links because I do think this is an important thing to read up on.

Re: Controversial opinions

[diet_poison]

No, it didn't, because the "freedom to have a kid" thing came up after the ethnicity/eugenics thing was shoved into the conversation.

And yes, from a completely literal standpoint, you have the freedom to have a kid. I retract my previous statement about that because I see now how creepy that was.

I do think that the way you put it made it sound like nobody cared about the consequences involved for the kid itself. Which is what worries me and scares me a bit about this conversation.

Re: Controversial opinions

[diet_poison]

I didn't say I didn't care about your links, I said I agreed with the point you were trying to make with them, which I have iterated at least a dozen times on this thread, so I'm not sure why you keep throwing them at me.

Your entire last paragraph doesn't really apply to anything I said. Actually, nobody said "poor people shouldn't have kids" and nobody agreeing with OP ever brought up "crazy welfare moms". There's a difference between being poor, and if you are in a position where you can barely feed yourself, how are you going to feed a kid? I actually think social programs like welfare *help* with this and make it more possible to raise a kid and therefore less dire to have one when you're struggling financially. Individual situations vary.

I don't really know what else to say here...I guess there's just a big disconnect here in that we're kinda talking about related by slightly different things.