[ SECRET POST #2693 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2693 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #385.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ], [ 1 - blank image ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: So trigger warnings finally made the New York Times

[(Anonymous)]

This draft mandate though...

“Be aware of racism, classism, sexism, heterosexism, cissexism, ableism, and other issues of privilege and oppression..."

That's a lot of things. And while unpleasant, they are not inherently traumatic. For some of us, these experiences are sadly quite prosaic. Insisting that they be warned for dilutes the meaning of "trigger warnings".

Re: So trigger warnings finally made the New York Times

[littlestbirds]

yeah... "contains people being verbally insensitive" describes most books with interesting content. I have to wonder how saying a book contains "ableism" would be helpful to anyone with specific trauma.

Without a very clear policy and guide as to what students can expect, this would be a train wreck. And students who aren't satisfied have to talk to the accessibility office, not their profs. But it's doable, universities are full of weirder shit. They're just being dramatic because the liberal arts education is under pressure to change from all sides these days.