case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-06-12 06:40 pm

[ SECRET POST #2718 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2718 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Mayim Bialik]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.
[Pacific Rim]











Notes:

Might be another 12 am day. Response time will be slow, sorry.

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 016 secrets from Secret Submission Post #388.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - this is getting spammy now ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-06-12 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Because it's impossible that she actually did her research and came to an informed opinion that doesn't happen to match yours? From everything I've seen of Mayim Bialik, this is a woman who does her research. Every single issue she is questioned about has a solid basis in fact, logic and reason. Look up anything with her talking about long-term breastfeeding, the family bed, her reasoning behind being Orthodox...she puts deep thought behind what she believes in. Maybe it's not what you see as right, but you can bet she's not blindly following anyone.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2014-06-12 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)
There is no solid evidence saying vaccines are bad or dangerous, though. If there is, none of the anti-vaxxers I've ever talked to has been able to produce it. It's not a scientifically sound "belief".
ariakas: (Default)

[personal profile] ariakas 2014-06-12 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)
It is impossible, actually. At least with regard to vaccines.
Edited 2014-06-12 23:54 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2014-06-13 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
She has a PhD in Neuroscience. Every class she would have taken in pursuit of that degree proves anti-vaxxers wrong.
(reply from suspended user)

(Anonymous) 2014-06-13 03:05 am (UTC)(link)
A neuroscience degree is years of biochemistry, genetics, biology, neurobiology, and sometimes even molecular biology. The science behind vaccines is actually fairly basic stuff, something more than acceptable to explain to a layperson. I encountered it first in intro to biology, the most basic of freshmen courses, and then in more detail in molecular biology. There's no way she didn't get dragged through extensively detailed research about vaccines in the pursuit of that particular doctorate.
(reply from suspended user)

(Anonymous) 2014-06-13 02:02 am (UTC)(link)
The guy who did the ONE study that the anti-vaccination movement sprung from was a lying con, who has now lost any shred of academic credibility.

He had a vested monetary interest in the study.

Do your research.