Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-06-15 03:45 pm
[ SECRET POST #2721 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2721 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 084 secrets from Secret Submission Post #389.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
I really think it's about the RL context than anything else. A lot of the reason whump for male characters is so popular and guilt-free is because it's a way of inverting RL power dynamics rather than reinforcing them. But sex and violence is and has always been somewhat related. The whole extremes-of-sensation, viscerally relatable embodiment, heightened awareness of physical bodies, empathy thing. I guess the other element is that it's more likely that a whumped male character will be a main character or otherwise well-developed, while a lot of female ones are flat characters.
Now I feel obliged to plug that AWESOME fan vid about that whole "suffers beautifully" male-whump-in-fandom-trope. You're supposed to pinpoint the moment in the vid where it goes from "yum, hot" to "ew omg this is so gross":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M392_kRIxjA
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
ETA: another thing is, I think there's a big difference between "fantasy" violence and "realistic" violence. Some of the things they show, like people with glowing sigils and writhing and stuff, I think that if it's not super real it allows people to enjoy the eye-candy more (at least, that's how it works for me). The more obviously fantastical it is the higher chance I'll be able to tolerate without cringing, at least in a mashup video like this that doesn't provide context for the violence happening, so half the time I don't know what's going on.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-16 12:02 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-16 12:12 am (UTC)(link)But the fact usually stands that in canon, the character has never been subjected to homophobia and discrimination aimed at him for being gay in canon, nor has ever been shown suffering from hiding his homosexuality in canon, which is just not the same as a canonically gay character being abused. A character who is never marginalized for his homosexuality in canon is not, technically, a member of a group women have systematic power over.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-16 02:56 am (UTC)(link)No.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-16 04:26 am (UTC)(link)A better analogy would be a character who appears to be male or female in canon, but is interpreted as being actually trans in a fanfic. Such a character can suffer cissexism-based marginalization within the fanfic's internal universe, but not as a canonical character when discussing the canon.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-16 08:11 am (UTC)(link)Becuase gay men don't have systematic power over straight women?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-16 08:16 am (UTC)(link)Straight women are the least oppressed class there is (saying this as woman, btw way.) We have a fuck load of perks no one else has.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-16 08:54 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-16 01:49 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-16 01:53 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-16 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)