[ SECRET POST #2750 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2750 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________


















02. [WARNING for animal death]




__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #393.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

What about straight people who don't have kids? Or straight people who adopt kids?

[mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com]

I don't know about SJWs, but according to Childfree usage, it is used as an epithet for bad parents (as well as parents who have lots of children). If used about the quality of parenting, it could get allied to adoptive parents as well, and let's face it, unless the adopted child is a different race to their adoptive parent, a CF person is not going to know they're adopted if the mother and child are random strangers. All the CF person will see is a noisy child in public with a mother who can't or won't handle it to their standards and their mind will instantly jump to "Bad parent!".