[ SECRET POST #2750 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2750 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________


















02. [WARNING for animal death]




__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #393.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[rbhudson]

Let's reclaim words like f*g and tr*ns because they're funny and we want to make jokes, but how DARE you call straight people something funny! You'll hurt our precious feefees </3

[diet_poison]

Is "tr*ns" supposed to be "trans" and if so when did that become a slur?????

[(Anonymous)]

Who the fuck knows. They probably meant main slur for trans people, not trans itself.

[(Anonymous)]

trans isn't the slur, it's tra*ny.

[diet_poison]

Yeah, that is a slur. Maybe that's what rbhudson mean to say?

[rbhudson]

Meant to type "tr*nny"

[(Anonymous)]

Just say "tranny" holy shit. It's in quotation marks. We know you're not personally saying it.

[(Anonymous)]

apparently a single asterisk somehow devoids its meaning and removes all offense from a slur (although, like you said, it's not like they're personally calling someone a "tranny" so there's no offense anyway).

[diet_poison]

gotcha, makes sense.

[(Anonymous)]

What is even with this comment.

Calling someone a breeder is pretty disgusting regardless of how it is meant.

[(Anonymous)]

The problem is this doesn't just apply to straight people. You don't have to be heterosexual to reproduce, so using "breeders" as an insult demeans people who aren't straight who might make the choice to have children. There are better ways to make fun of straight people.

[(Anonymous)]

the only people allowed to reclaim words like "fag" and "tranny" (or at least I'm assuming that's the one you meant since "trans" hasn't really ever been a slur) are the people who belong to those groups. straight and/or cis people who say them are generally side eyed. so if you're talking about reclaiming words then wouldn't that mean that only straight people should be allowed to use the word "breeder" (ignoring the fact that straight people are the only ones who can reproduce, as pointed out by another anon)

Also, "breeder" is just a pretty degrading term in general, especially towards women.

[(Anonymous)]

*aren't the only ones