case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-07-14 06:37 pm

[ SECRET POST #2750 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2750 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________


















02. [WARNING for animal death]




__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #393.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Canon Sues

(Anonymous) 2014-07-15 04:09 am (UTC)(link)
I don't really feel like original characters can be Mary Sues. Bad characters, maybe, but Mary Sue used to only mean fan insertion. Not character who's good at stuff.
philstar22: (Default)

Re: Canon Sues

[personal profile] philstar22 2014-07-15 12:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I think canon characters can be sues, though it is probably harder. Being good at stuff is not enough. But when you have a character like Richard Rahl who is good at everything without even trying and who does a lot of really bad stuff that canon says is good and who is treated as never wrong by canon, I do think you have a sue.