Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-07-25 07:08 pm
[ SECRET POST #2761 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2761 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05. [SPOILERS for Radio Free Roscoe]

__________________________________________________
06. [SPOILERS for Yu-Gi-Oh 5D's]

__________________________________________________
07. [SPOILERS for Puella Magi Madoka Magica]

__________________________________________________
08. [SPOILERS for The Burbs]

__________________________________________________
09. [SPOILERS for Maleficent]

__________________________________________________
10. [SPOILERS for Game of Thrones]

__________________________________________________
11. [SPOILERS for Legend of Korra]

12. [WARNING for incest]

__________________________________________________
13. [WARNING for rape]
http://i.imgur.com/JX1fY7K.jpg
[linked for porn/rape(?), live-action]
__________________________________________________
14. [WARNING for abuse, rape, etc]

__________________________________________________
15. [WARNING for dub-con, underage (?)]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #394.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - ships it ], [ 1 - more random image spam ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: unpopular opinions thread
Re: unpopular opinions thread
theywe latched onto a silly idea and never corrected it. (I've done it myself, and I'm probably still doing it about something where I don't even know I'm doing it.)For some fields, that's mostly harmless. If you don't really understand molecular biology, but you're not trying to practice medicine, we can largely let your ignorance slide.
On the other hand, most people should know something about nutrition, unless they're not responsible for anyone's diet including their own.
For a potential voter in a democracy, failing to understand basic demand-side macroeconomics is a potential serious problem. Granted, many voters vote for non-pocketbook reasons. But if people are repeating things like our troll here, that may be because they heard them from someone that is being found credible. And it's (sadly) close enough to things I've heard other persons of voting age say, and heard actual politicians say, that I have to assume there is a constituency for this sort of prejudice, that keeps electing politicians who will actively vote for demand-side-neglecting economic thinking. And then we get widespread poverty and depressions.
I considered that iceyred might be trolling, but she(?) stuck with it, so I decided to answer it as best I could.
And I think a lot of right-leaning people would benefit from reading Paul Krugman's works for the non-economist. He explains things in a way that makes many pundits look like incoherent jabberers in comparison.
Now that's an unpopular opinion!