[ SECRET POST #2797 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2797 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 085 secrets from Secret Submission Post #400.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[cbrachyrhynchos]

I'd say the difference between Pullman on the one hand and Lewis and Tolkien isn't that Pullman is preachy. It's that Lewis and Tolkien (generally, not always) rise above a bar where their preachyness flies under the radar.

Stories should have a point, which is a conflict. If the story goes nowhere and does nothing, it's not really a story.

[jaybie_jarrett]

Hm yes that's true.

[(Anonymous)]

No. Not necessarily conflict. That's a western fallacy:

http://stilleatingoranges.tumblr.com/post/25153960313/the-significance-of-plot-without-conflict

But yes, they do need a point, and I totally agree with the rest of your comment. :)