case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-09-03 08:28 pm

[ SECRET POST #2801 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2801 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 031 secrets from Secret Submission Post #400.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-04 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
A couple of people threatened to beat her enough to cripple her for life too:

https://twitter.com/TheQuinnspiracy/status/507097470854131713/photo/1

(Anonymous) 2014-09-04 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
Is she related to MySpace? Why is Tom from MySpace in the background?

Mostly... wow. This shit makes me wish wank were still "your OTP sucks and mine is so canon." We had it easy.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-04 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
Man internet threats don't mean shit and I'm tired of people acting like they do ONLY when they are aimed at women.

It's just a shitty way of expressing anger.
chardmonster: (Default)

[personal profile] chardmonster 2014-09-04 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
They dont mean shit until they do.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-04 12:58 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly. Sadly, this is how a lot of stalkers are treated as well. Cops only take it seriously when violence has been committed. There was one case of a girl who while attending university had a stalker send videos to her, one of which included footage of him right outside her workplace. It eventually ended with him in handcuffs when he tried to break into her apartment with a knife, a video camera, and duct tape in his backpack. He was still given a lighter sentence by the court though because "no real violence had been committed".

SA

(Anonymous) 2014-09-04 01:11 am (UTC)(link)
Here's the source to the example I was referring to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nV_PdCvbKkQ
mekkio: (Default)

[personal profile] mekkio 2014-09-04 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
The majority of the time, I say over 99% of the time they don't. But every so often you get a nut who makes good on their threat.
erinptah: Vintage screensaver (computing)

[personal profile] erinptah 2014-09-04 01:01 am (UTC)(link)
(a) When people dig up your actual home address and attach it to the threats, that means something.

(b) Even when it comes to threats with no personal info, the fact that they are disproportionately aimed at women is still worth talking about.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-04 05:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Unless it's tumblr people doxxing others and threatening them, then it's not so bad.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-04 01:03 am (UTC)(link)
Something tells me most of those replies are people telling whoever posted that not to be a shit. That's the part no one shows.

Let's do a little archive surfing. Yeah the post was deleted. No one agreed and told them to fuck off.

http://sta.sh/01jd7d8ozzgc

(Anonymous) 2014-09-04 01:08 am (UTC)(link)
Could you provide a screencap of all of the replies? Otherwise this is kind of confirmation bias.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-04 01:11 am (UTC)(link)
Try searching archive.moe

(Anonymous) 2014-09-04 01:11 am (UTC)(link)
http://boards.4chan.org/v/thread/261371267

ctrl f 261372435

(Anonymous) 2014-09-04 01:13 am (UTC)(link)
Thank you.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-04 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
Deleted image since I linked the thread below.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-04 01:46 am (UTC)(link)
Man like

I'm not a big fan of cheating but since when did it become the done thing to get Internet gangs together and go around shaming people who cheat (let alone actually enforcing them like some kind of medieval village morality squad)

and it really seems like that's something like 60% of what this whole imbroglio is

(Anonymous) 2014-09-04 03:06 am (UTC)(link)
It's not about the cheating really. It's about who it's with. If she wasn't in a relationship with someone it would still be that she's a gamemaker sleeping with a reporter who is giving her good reviews and her boss.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-04 06:11 am (UTC)(link)
Except he didn't even give her a good review. He mentioned the name of her game once in an article and that was it.