Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-09-04 06:59 pm
[ SECRET POST #2802 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2802 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

[Warriors]
__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

[Harry Potter]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Sweet Fuse: At Your Side]
__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

[Stargate Atlantis]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Black M]
__________________________________________________
10.

[The Lyon's Den]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Hannah Simone]
__________________________________________________
12.

[Bouletcorp]
__________________________________________________
13.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #400.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
I mean, I get that some people just ship something for the porn and ship them because they're both hot and look good together and that's enough to satisfy them, but this cutesy stuff...IDGI. Can fandom cuteness be as divorced from characterization as some fandom porn is, and still be satisfying?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-04 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-04 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-05 03:32 am (UTC)(link)no subject
it's like taking something they like (maybe just the looks, or the power dynamics, often a trope they identify with) and to twist it into a "safe" cutesey romantic fantasy.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-05 03:35 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Then again, it's the same reason my fandom is full of AUs whose characters have little to nothing in common with their canon counterparts but the name. It's something I don't understand - I like *these* characters, not Generic Male #846937 who happens to look like one of them.
People seem to really like characters being ooc.
Then again, I've had someone in a fandom tell me once that uh, of COURSE they would NEVER write about the icky, horrible canon version of the character! Their AU version of him is COMPLETELY different, and I shouldn't dare confuse them because Canon Dude is evil and abusive.
And I'm like................. wtf. If you hate him, why write about him at all.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-05 05:09 am (UTC)(link)