Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-09-21 03:28 pm
[ SECRET POST #2819 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2819 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07. [nf]
__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 054 secrets from Secret Submission Post #403.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-21 07:52 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-21 07:56 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-21 08:04 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-21 08:08 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
It also makes me sad because 1550s-1560s fashions were hella epic, and there's so much they could do with the aesthetic while maintaining a more casual vibe.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-21 08:39 pm (UTC)(link)(I realize that sounds negative re: CW, but I think it's smart.)
no subject
I suppose it's not particularly period, but it is very pretty, and pretty close to stylish modern clothing.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-09-22 04:35 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-22 03:18 am (UTC)(link)(Does the CW have Pretty Little Liars too? Because that would explain why it has a tie-in clothing line.)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-09-22 04:30 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-21 09:03 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-09-21 22:28 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-22 12:28 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-09-22 03:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-09-22 22:03 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-21 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-21 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-22 12:30 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-22 02:42 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-22 03:02 am (UTC)(link)Sure, make a Gossip-Girl-esque historical AU, but don't pretend you care a damn about Mary Stuart or history. They don't even try and aim for 1500's inspired fashion, there's dresses from the 1700's and 1800's in there and it just looks ridiculous.
I can't find a source atm, but the costume designer said something along the lines of "Girls aren't interested in history". Well fuck you too.
I hate this show.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-22 03:33 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-22 04:46 am (UTC)(link)Yeah, let's see a source, because I have read a ton of interviews with the costume designers for Reign and they have never fucking ever said anything even close to this.
As for "pretending to give a damn", they have been up front about the clothing from the beginning, and never expected anyone to think they were trying for historically accurate.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-22 08:16 pm (UTC)(link)http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/cws-reign-star-her-show-595499
http://deadline.com/2013/07/tca-cws-first-crunchy-gravel-drama-flirts-with-history-552425/
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-09-22 22:56 (UTC) - Expand