[ SECRET POST #345 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #345 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.


__________________________________________________



2.


__________________________________________________



3.


__________________________________________________



4.


__________________________________________________



5.


__________________________________________________



6.


__________________________________________________



7.


__________________________________________________



8.


__________________________________________________



9.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.


__________________________________________________



23.


__________________________________________________



24.


__________________________________________________



25.


__________________________________________________



26.


__________________________________________________



27.


__________________________________________________



28.


__________________________________________________



29.


__________________________________________________



30.


__________________________________________________



31.


__________________________________________________



32.


__________________________________________________



33.


__________________________________________________



34.


__________________________________________________



35.


__________________________________________________



36.


__________________________________________________



37.


__________________________________________________



38.


__________________________________________________



39.


__________________________________________________



40.


__________________________________________________



41.


__________________________________________________



42.


__________________________________________________



43.


__________________________________________________



44.


__________________________________________________



45.


__________________________________________________



46.


__________________________________________________



47.


__________________________________________________





Notes:

Now affiliated with rp_secrets! If you're looking for purely RP-related stuff, check it out. Note that this does not mean that fandomsecrets is banning RP-related secrets, but maybe it'll divert the tide a bit?

Secrets Left to Post: 10 pages, 250 secrets from Secret Submission Post #050.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom, [ 1 2 ] too big, [ 1 2 ] repeats.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Monday, December 17th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[mercale.livejournal.com]

But is it not the person's right to be so dissatisfied with those real people that they would rather not deal with them?

[kinneas.livejournal.com]

"I pretty much told him to screw off."

Not like that. =\

Mama taught me how to be polite. I don't feel like hanging out, then I nicely say so.

[mercale.livejournal.com]

Well, not everyone is polite. Some people are more shy and have to be subtle. Some people are just blunt. That is that person's right.

[kinneas.livejournal.com]

"Screw off" is more than blunt; it's rude as hell. Yes, you have the right to be that way, but that doesn't mean you SHOULD BE. This is called tact. Our OP does not appear to possess it.

[mercale.livejournal.com]

She 'pretty much' told him that. The secret doesn't say she 'actually' said it. Which means she showed some restraint, which you are not at the moment. Please acquire some tact to prevent 'get some fucking social skills' before you suggest others get some.

[(Anonymous)]

LOLOLOL because "get some fucking social skills" is real polite

[kinneas.livejournal.com]

I never said I was polite on the internets.

[mercale.livejournal.com]

Lack of inhibitions much? Just because you have the internet to protect you doesn't mean you should abandon that politeness you were raised with. What would your parents think?

[kinneas.livejournal.com]

Actually, it was Dad that taught me to be polite, and like myself he doesn't give a right damn what people on the internet think. I am very hypocritical about my politeness re:the internet, and that's okay with me.

Please, I don't mean this rudely, but don't preach to me when you're forgiving her for her treatment of her boyfriend.

[mercale.livejournal.com]

So you have the right to be hypocritical with how you treat people and this person does not?

And how do I know you do not mean this rudely as you have said you do not care about politeness online how am I to know you are not merely mocking me?

I do not forgive this girl, but I can understand her position and find your attack of her to be a little ridiculous. Take this rudely if you desire.

[kinneas.livejournal.com]

I think I specifically said she completely had the right, just that I don't approve of it.

I don't recall asking anyone to agree with me.

Like I said to anon over there, "It's an odd code, and I'm not defending it. I don't take anything anyone on the internet says to me seriously (unless it's via instant message), and so I don't think much of my own actions.

But this isn't about me. This is about this girl saying to her boyfriend who clearly wanted to be with her that a videogame was more important than him.

I can understand her sentiment, but that is no way to treat a person obviously Not Okay with it."

[mercale.livejournal.com]

See below for my response to that silly statement.

And you don't have to ask anyone to agree with you to get opinions on the internet. The same thing that allows you to be more rude here makes people more willing to tell you their own opinions. Though frankly, if I had seen you in person and heard you say this I would have responded.

[kinneas.livejournal.com]

I doubt I would have said this in person unless I knew you very well.

And again, I don't see where I said people weren't allowed to disagree with me. I think you're operating under the assumption that my comment was an attempt to start a dialogue on this, when really I sort of don't care =\

Also gsjfgsjk you're replying faster than my poor old laptop can handle D:

[mercale.livejournal.com]

If you didn't want, in one way or another, to open yourself to a conversation upon this, you would not have said anything. That is the way that conversations work. You say something, and leave yourself open for another person to respond, whether you desire their input or not. If you don't care, don't talk.

[kinneas.livejournal.com]

Everyone always seems to think that caring is a prerequisite to posting on a forum. It's not.

I also didn't NOT want a dialogue to open. I really didn't care.

brb, chili.

[(Anonymous)]

so saying fuck off to someone over AIM or LJ is somehow different from saying it to their face? is the only excuse you ever have for being condescending or rude "because it's the internet"?

[kinneas.livejournal.com]

It's an odd code, and I'm not defending it. I don't take anything anyone on the internet says to me seriously (unless it's via instant message), and so I don't think much of my own actions.

But this isn't about me. This is about this girl saying to her boyfriend who clearly wanted to be with her that a videogame was more important than him.

I can understand her sentiment, but that is no way to treat a person obviosly Not Okay with it.

[mercale.livejournal.com]

If he did not understand that something was important to her and could not be okay with that, then she might have been better off without him.

[kinneas.livejournal.com]

That's a very self-centered way of thinking.

[mercale.livejournal.com]

And being polite only when it suits you is not?

You do not know the situation with the relationship, so you are in no place to judge. I only defend this person's right to live their life the way they see fit.

[kinneas.livejournal.com]

And now you claim I have no right to judge (legitimately wondering, not drawing assumption)? You may not approve of it, as I don't of this girl, but I do have that right.

[mercale.livejournal.com]

Have you ever been in her situation? Have you lived her life? Do you even understand any of the circumstances beyond what is told to us?

No?

Then you have no right to judge the person really. Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. Are you completely innocent such that you can really be fit to judge her decisions?

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

I don't take anything anyone on the internet says to me seriously (unless it's via instant message), and so I don't think much of my own actions.

So that's why you're a raging cunt hole.

(frozen comment)

[case]

WTF?? Ok no.

[(Anonymous)]

IAWTC