Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-11-02 03:38 pm
[ SECRET POST #2861 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2861 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #409.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-02 08:50 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-02 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)/jk, I'd like to know why, too, but I'm pretty sure those are the real reasons/
OP
(Anonymous) 2014-11-02 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-11-02 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)People could write what they wanted, but it would just be in certain places and not others.
Re: OP
Re: OP
As for shipping fics in particular, there are certainly more crappy ship fic than crappy gen fics, but that's because there are more ship fics than gen fics total. The proportion of crap in both is about the same.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-11-03 12:56 am (UTC)(link)People would still write shit, or boring stories, or well-intentioned stories rife with grammatical errors, or hilaribad pointless one-shots (not one-shots in general). People would still push for graphic content with mixed results. Some of the worst written stories I've encountered actually had nothing to do with romance.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-11-03 12:56 am (UTC)(link)...are you her?
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-11-03 02:10 am (UTC)(link)I didn't get that vibe from the OP though.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-11-03 02:18 am (UTC)(link)No. I don't harass anyone who writes shipping fic, I just don't like it or want to see it.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-11-03 02:52 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-11-03 09:41 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-11-03 05:15 am (UTC)(link)You can also just not read it. Does seeing a title and summary bother you that much?
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-11-03 06:57 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-11-03 06:19 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
*unless it's a by invitation archive, and do those even exist any longer?
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-11-03 03:23 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
I don't mind people making smaller archives that are invitation only/audition only, but a mainstream archive like ao3 or ff.net? No way.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-11-03 03:47 am (UTC)(link)I can see the logic in having places that are more exploratory and general and having the archives be about quality over quantity.
Re: OP
While it's important for fanfic archives to cater toward readers, it's even more important in my opinion for them to be a welcoming place for writers. They're the ones doing the work.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-11-03 05:31 am (UTC)(link)You're assuming fanfic is the same as original fic, and saying that fanfic sites should have some sort of quality control when there's no incentive to do so. You're saying that other people should put in a lot of work into changing a site's purpose and workings for no reason other than the benefit of you and people like you, it's very naive way of thinking but it does show how spoiled you've been by the existence of fic/free published writing.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-11-03 13:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-11-03 10:05 am (UTC)(link)One of the best genficcers I know applied for an invite to a "quality" genfic comm and was turned down.
My own fic on a gated archive was "corrected" by the archive beta who didn't know punctuation that well or have a wide vocabulary.
Quality control archives just don't work. There's a reason they fell out of favour.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-11-03 20:37 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-03 12:27 am (UTC)(link)The problem with this is that you're imagining fanfic writers as a zero sum game. You seem to imagine that if, in this theoretical fantasyworld of yours, it was made more difficult for fanfic writers to write romance fics (by reducing the places where they could post their fic) they'd switch to genfic instead, or that some other kind of switch would take place wherein the amount and quality of genfic would increase in correlation to the decline of shipping fics.
As others have said, your 'solution' to your irritation would solve absolutely nothing. It wouldn't make romance writers suddenly write gen, therefore the amount and quality of the pool would remain exactly the same. It would either make romance writers stop, thus depriving the majority of both outlet and enjoyment, or they'd simply move elsewhere and that would become the big archive and gen would remain marginalized.
Because people already write and create the things they enjoy, and the things they're interested in. If that skews onto one track more than another, then that's just how it is.
Gen isn't marginalized because of shipping. Gen is marginalized because fewer people enjoy reading and writing it. Blaming shipping or romance for that is ludicrous. Blaming the people who write and enjoy shipping and romance is just you being bitter.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-03 12:27 am (UTC)(link)