[ SECRET POST #2876 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2876 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[The Boxtrolls]


__________________________________________________



03.
[One Piece]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Hockey RPF, Patrick Kane]


__________________________________________________



05.
[The Silmarillion]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Meghan Trainor: All About That Bass]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Radiant Historia]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Twin Peaks]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Meghan Trainor]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Taylor Swift]



__________________________________________________



11.
[Star Wars]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #411.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Characters Unfairly Treated Like "Canon OCs" in your fandom?

[kamino_neko]

Agreed. I came into this thread strictly to see wtf that term is even supposed to mean.

Re: Characters Unfairly Treated Like "Canon OCs" in your fandom?

[(Anonymous)]

Well, Tauriel could literally be considered a Canon OC - meaning an OC for the book!verse, but canon nonetheless in the movie!verse?

OP

[(Anonymous)]

If I had to guess, I'd say that it came from basically someone trying to "other" a particular character they didn't like. Sorta like discontinuity on a particular character instead of an episode/book. "This character isn't doesn't even "count" they might as well be like someone's OC in the canon".

IA that it's dumb. Sorry people, but your "unfave" IS actually apart of the canon.

ADDITION

[(Anonymous)]

Unless they're referring to a character created and added like the anon above mentioned. I believe that's a more right use of the term. And depending how it's pulled off, it doesn't have to be a bad thing. If the character added is good then who cares?