case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-11-29 04:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #2888 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2888 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #413.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 (rape) - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-29 09:22 pm (UTC)(link)
You can't think of a logical reason why you will always choose a male character over a female one when you can make that choice, but you're ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN it's not internalized misogyny!

(Anonymous) 2014-11-29 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Not OP: I have yet to actually see more than one or two valid, peer-reviewed sources saying internalized misogyny even exists. So I'd be pretty certain.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-29 09:47 pm (UTC)(link)
So you admit that you read studies affirming its existence... and don't care.

Well, okey-dokey.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-29 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
No, I said I've read one or two. I've also read one or two peer-reviewed articles saying global warming isn't real. Therefore I *don't* care. Not until there's more evidence.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-30 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
You've never seen a woman or girl shit on other women or girls for doing feminine things or having feminine traits?

Do other things that don't make it through academia suddenly not exist?
comradesmiler: (Default)

[personal profile] comradesmiler 2014-11-29 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Not OP: it only exists as an excuse for SJW's to treat women like shit.

NAYRT

(Anonymous) 2014-11-29 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)
It seems in direct opposition to the whole "personal choice" side of the feminist equation:

"I want to be a computer engineer!" = Great!

"I want to be a pilot" = OK.

"I want to be a flight attendant" = …well, at least it's a career.

"I want to be a stay-at-home mother" = INTERNALIZED MISOGYNY.

In other worlds, personal choice is great as long as you choose what they want you to. That's not choice.
comradesmiler: (Default)

Re: NAYRT

[personal profile] comradesmiler 2014-11-29 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)
That, and whenever they disagree with certain parts of feminism.

Re: NAYRT

(Anonymous) 2014-11-29 10:00 pm (UTC)(link)
You even have those kinds of feminists sneeringly refer to it as "choice feminism."

Re: NAYRT

(Anonymous) 2014-11-29 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I've even had feminists come down on my head because I chose to be a teacher, and love it.

SA

(Anonymous) 2014-11-29 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I've even had "feminists" come down on my head because I chose to be a teacher, and love it.


(Specifying because I'm all for feminism. But not at the expense of other's happiness)

Re: NAYRT

(Anonymous) 2014-11-30 01:05 am (UTC)(link)
And "Fun!Feminism".

(Anonymous) 2014-11-29 09:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Wrong. Women policing other women is its result. Women slicing up young girls' genitals to keep them "pure"?

(Anonymous) 2014-11-29 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know where that came from, but I wish it would go away because you're not making my argument look any better. And I'm bad at arguing, so it's not like I started off on a high note.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-29 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Every group polices themselves and others. Women police other women. Teenage boys police teenage boys. (XYZ race) polices the other members of (XYZ race).

Yeah, some of those actions are pretty damn disgusting and should disappear, but the only reason society and culture can EXIST is because of policing as a general idea.
comradesmiler: (Default)

[personal profile] comradesmiler 2014-11-29 10:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Fine, MOST of the time it's an excuse.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-29 10:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't call that misogyny necessarily, I'd call that buying into social and cultural structures with misogynistic roots and/or results. Misogyny at a remove, or misogyny by implication, rather than internalized.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-29 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)
That's just splitting hairs, now.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-30 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
I thought it was more in response to "I love Dude because he knows what he wants in a lady and gets it and he's had so many lovers and he's just so cool and mysterious. Ewww, why does Dudette have to be such a slut? No one's going to respect her unless she leaves something to the imagination and closes her legs once in a while."
"Uuuh"
"Oh don't worry I'm a lady too, so it's ok to say stuff like that!"

Or even just general stuff like "My genitals are so gross and smelly and I should scrub/perfume/disinfect them and try weird herbal supplements to try and make it so anyone would find them appealing!"

(Anonymous) 2014-11-29 09:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Not everyone needs their characters to look, act, and think the exact same way they do to enjoy a game.

[personal profile] anonymous4 2014-11-29 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)
It's perfectly possible for the OP to have assessed herself in other situations and concluded that she doesn't suffer from 'internalised misogyny'.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-29 10:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I think if a person can choose a protagonist and decides that women couldn't be it, every single time, that they could do a little more assessment.
comradesmiler: (Default)

[personal profile] comradesmiler 2014-11-29 10:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Why the fuck should they? It's not that big a deal.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-29 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)
You're right, it's not a big deal. It's okay to admit that we're not perfect. So why is it so hard for OP to consider that, at least in this ONE thing, that maybe she's got some negative ideas about women?

(no subject)

[personal profile] comradesmiler - 2014-11-29 22:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2014-11-30 03:10 (UTC) - Expand

Not OP

(Anonymous) - 2014-11-29 22:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] anonymous4 - 2014-11-29 22:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2014-11-30 01:26 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2014-11-30 03:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2014-11-30 07:26 (UTC) - Expand
beverlykatz: (Default)

[personal profile] beverlykatz 2014-11-30 01:40 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe she just prefers playing as a dude. It's a perfectly valid preference. And yeah, OP can be sure that it's not internalized misogyny if she's interrogated her own motivations and concluded that that isn't a factor in her preference.