[ SECRET POST #2911 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2911 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 045 secrets from Secret Submission Post #416.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 (same words, different image) - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

So then in your view, when the sixth Harry Potter book was released, people who were posting in the Internet, or putting up highway signs, or yelling at people standing in line for the book, about how Snape killed Dumbledore did nothing wrong?

After all, they got the book legally and it had already been released, so it seems to pass your test.

[(Anonymous)]

Nope, not a damn thing. And if people had stopped being so OTT in their reactions they would have stopped in short order.

That is why I'm not marking this post for spoilers Harry Potter booksix. If you believed they were doing something wrong, how come you didn't? Double standards much?

[diet_poison]

because common sense? days/weeks after a book comes out =/= many years after a book comes out

Also way to put the onus for people not being assholes on the recipients of the assholish behavior.

[(Anonymous)]

That is what the assholes who insist people censor their behavior for the benefit of the first group always do. If you don't want to see spoilers, that is on you to avoid them. Totally on you. Nobody else. Be courteous, and do not demand other people alter their lives for your sake.

[(Anonymous)]

So I guess asking some people to not be assholes is too much? Of course it is. Stupid question.

[(Anonymous)]

I've tried asking people not to be assholes, but Diet Poison keeps on being one nonetheless.

[(Anonymous)]

Wtf, diet poison is one of the nicest people on here

[(Anonymous)]

Only if you agree with her.

[diet_poison]

Ah, so you are one of the anons from the other day...

I don't even know what to say to you to not make you angry. I think my stance is pretty reasonable and I was pretty reasonable throughout that whole discussion. *shrug*

[dethtoll]

Where's the remote, this is another rerun...

[otakugal15]

Dude, I know I don't always agree with her, and I KNOW she doesn't always agree with me, but what kind of shit are you smoking? Her? A jerk? THE FUCK?

Get the fuck off this site, you asshole.

[diet_poison]

I actually find this really touching.

Thanks Otaku. :)

[otakugal15]

You're welcome. I know I'm a shit, but even I can't stand to see people mudslingged who don't deserve it.

[diet_poison]

Refraining from deliberately spoiling a major installment in a very popular book series within days of its release isn't altering your life for anyone, unless I guess the point of your life is to go around being an asshole. Not to mention there is literally no way to avoid that unless you think people should literally board themselves up in their room, not talk to a single human being either online or irl, and do nothing but read until they've finished the book - which may not even be possible if they have work or classes. (Not to mention that principle applies to every other instance of people being an asshole for no reason - why should other people rearrange their lives to avoid them when it would take so little effort to just not be an asshole)

...I mean, that is what we're talking about, isn't it? Or are you one of the anons from the other day and this is really about something else...?

[(Anonymous)]

Hell, at this point I don't even know any more. Would it kill you to quote the post you are replying to once a thread has formed.

[diet_poison]

Well, you can click the "parent" button if you need to.

The comment I replied to is part of a conversation that included:

"So then in your view, when the sixth Harry Potter book was released, people who were posting in the Internet, or putting up highway signs, or yelling at people standing in line for the book, about how Snape killed Dumbledore did nothing wrong?

After all, they got the book legally and it had already been released, so it seems to pass your test."

My question in the last line was because I didn't know if anon was talking about actual book spoilers for books that just came out or if they were bringing up other shit from other days (based on the rest of the thread). It turned out to be the latter, actually.

[(Anonymous)]

What the heck happened the other day?

[diet_poison]

ok it was actually like a week ago, I'd forgotten how long ago it was

http://fandomsecrets.dreamwidth.org/1129495.html?thread=799553047#cmt799553047

[(Anonymous)]

Fair enough then. I think your answer is insane and clearly wrong but I appreciate your consistency.

[(Anonymous)]

Likewise on all counts. I wish you a Merry Christmas good sir or madam.