Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-12-28 03:38 pm
[ SECRET POST #2917 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2917 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 040 secrets from Secret Submission Post #417.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
More of Riza's relationship with alchemy, more of her life outside of her work relationships, more than the little tease we get of Riza + Winry, more of Riza and Roy and Hughes all being in it together before [Volume 4 happens]. The place this really gets me is actually in 'Brotherhood,' because I understand a lot of this wasn't placed in the early part of the manga, since it's pretty clear Riza's backstory wasn't invented until late in the game, but FMA:B really had an opportunity to take what we know from later on and integrate it with the earlier events and. . .didn't, so much.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-28 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
The storyline doesn't have to be your cuppa, though, that's cool!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-28 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)The fact it happens so often is something that should be criticized, but a character shouldn't be tossed aside just because it's a part of their development. They should be judged based on the whole, not just on a part.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-29 12:13 am (UTC)(link)What I'm saying is that fictional women are disproportionally shown to be motivated by their relationship to a man, while fictional men get to have much wider pool of reasons for doing things. It's like the Bechdel Test: the point isn't if this or this film passes it, the point is that the sheer number of films that FAIL tells us something about how the film industry at large perceives women.
The fact that so many of our most popular stories tell us that women do things because Some More Important Guy is her boyfriend/brother/childhood friend who she promised to marry, tells us that a lot of our storytellers believe that men are the driving motivation for any important decision in women's lives.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-29 12:38 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-29 12:35 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-29 12:43 am (UTC)(link)