case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-01-11 03:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #2930 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2930 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 076 secrets from Secret Submission Post #419.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
othellia: (Default)

[personal profile] othellia 2015-01-11 09:14 pm (UTC)(link)
You can always take the pragmatic (albeit pessimistic) approach: no one accomplishes these sorts of things in real life and the authors are even more bitter about it than you to the point that they wrote up their own fantasies in an attempt to live vicariously through them and then published it all.
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

[personal profile] iceyred 2015-01-11 10:11 pm (UTC)(link)
This is the truth. Don't compare yourself to fictional characters OP. Very few people are that awesome in real life.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-12 01:09 am (UTC)(link)
Considering there ARE people who accomplishes those things in real life, wouldn't it be more pragmatic to say it's very rare? Self-deception only works for so long.
othellia: (Default)

[personal profile] othellia 2015-01-12 01:47 am (UTC)(link)
Okay, true. Very rare.

But you might as well beat yourself up every day for not having won the lottery yet rare.
ariakas: (Default)

[personal profile] ariakas 2015-01-12 08:35 am (UTC)(link)
I honestly don't think they are any 24-year-old Nobel prize winners in physics, so "no one" would actually be more accurate than "very rare".

(Anonymous) 2015-01-12 12:01 pm (UTC)(link)
The youngest noble prize winner period was 25, so you'd be correct. Also, he received the prize jointly with his father, so up to you whether it really counts or not.