case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-01-11 03:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #2930 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2930 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 076 secrets from Secret Submission Post #419.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: TW: adultery, self harm

(Anonymous) 2015-01-11 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)
This was a bad decision at best, sexual coercion at worst.

EXACTLY!

And whichever of these it was, this fucker needs to face some consequences.

Re: TW: adultery, self harm

(Anonymous) 2015-01-11 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't want to rain on your Fuck Yeah Justice parade, but what consequences are you referring to? If this is in the U.S., 17 is over the age of consent for most states. So actually, there are quite a few places where it's legal for a 30-something man to have sex with a 17 year old girl. It's arguably not moral and in this case I'd say it's definitely not moral because of the teacher/student relationship, but it's not necessarily illegal.

Unless the anon is prepared to go the whole nine yards and talk to the police, it's unlikely he'd be fired, either. Not unless his employer is unusually conscientious.