case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-01-11 03:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #2930 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2930 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 076 secrets from Secret Submission Post #419.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-01-12 03:18 am (UTC)(link)
To be more specific, the problem with being linked to a f-locked post isn't that the post is f-locked but that someone thought it would be a good idea to link to it. In other words - it's a user problem, not a platform problem.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-12 03:24 am (UTC)(link)
Agreed.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-12 03:26 am (UTC)(link)
I think sometimes the case was also that someone would link to a lj post, which then became friend-locked later.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-12 04:23 am (UTC)(link)
NAYRT

This was often the case.

I was randomly browsing old Fandom Wank entries the other day, and most of the links that went to LJ from those entries were now flocked.

Posts that were locked after-the-fact, usually because of traffic or wank, is basically the same thing as deleting a Tumblr post. The only difference (and privacy issue) is that reblogs stay even when the original is gone, which isn't the case when you block access to a journal entry.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-01-13 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
Did that happen often for personal reasons or was it just more marketing shit (as mentioned in other parts of the thread)?

(Anonymous) 2015-01-13 04:08 am (UTC)(link)
I think mostly what I saw in posts getting locked after the fact was cases where people would make a post, it would attract wank, and then it would get locked, because the OP didn't want to deal with it.

I know of cases where people would go back and retroactively lock their episode reactions/reviews because they'd unexpectedly had an influx of new followers and didn't want to deal with people arguing with them about their feelings about the show in question.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-01-13 05:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Man, that sounds like a pain. People ruining a nice thing are annoying. :(