[ SECRET POST #2939 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2939 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 036 secrets from Secret Submission Post #420.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Honestly, I can totally believe that this character's popularity comes from the exact same place Roschart's popularity comes from. It's a power fantasy, and I think it's disingenuous to believe that women who've been cheated on, or are otherwise angry about something in their lives, wouldn't identify with Amy.

Is it feminist? It's really up for debate, because while she's a terrible human being, she's a dynamic character. IDK why male characters get to be enjoyed as-is (they're either good/fun/interesting characters) but a female character is defined by whether she's feminist or not.

[(Anonymous)]

Right, but people who think Rorschach is admirable (including the "just needs a hug" contingent) are also kinda morally reprehensible. My objection to the feminist labeling is that I don't like when people say that morally reprehensible stances are appropriate and progressive.