case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-01-29 06:52 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

[ SECRET POST #2948 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2948 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #421.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Re: Het Erasure?

(Anonymous) 2015-01-30 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
Not really there even. It's inaccurate terminology. There's just not a lot of het.

Re: Het Erasure?

(Anonymous) 2015-01-30 01:05 am (UTC)(link)
Yes...because fans erase it...

Re: Het Erasure?

(Anonymous) 2015-01-30 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
How are the fans erasing it?

Canon het couples don't magically become less canon or less het no matter how much slash or femmeslash there is.

Similarly, the volume of slash produced does not in any way impede het writers from also producing works.

Re: Het Erasure?

(Anonymous) 2015-01-30 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
In fairness, people who want to talk about LBGT erasure do, in fact, sometimes argue that putting canon LBGT characters into het ships actually constitutes erasure

I think this is a stupid position, for much the same reasons you've outlined here, but it is a thing that people actually think

Re: Het Erasure?

(Anonymous) 2015-01-30 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
those people are literally wrong tho

Re: Het Erasure?

(Anonymous) 2015-01-30 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
you may be technically correct but i think it is wrong in terms of the larger connotations of the term

Re: Het Erasure?

(Anonymous) 2015-01-30 11:48 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, how dare minority sexualities decide to interpret characters as non-heterosexual! We should just deal with the scraps we're given!
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only