case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-01-31 03:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #2950 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2950 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 065 secrets from Secret Submission Post #422.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: PWP

(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 08:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Does the sex mean something in an overarching story that isn't "and then they fucked, perhaps repeatedly, the end", and is there actual character development that isn't related to sex?

If Y: not PWP
If N: PWP
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: PWP

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-01-31 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Hm. I'd further divide it into "porn without plot" (short, just sex), "porn with porny plot" (plot, but only focusing on the sex/sexual part of a relationship) and then porn with an actual story that has nothing to do with the porn in the last category.

I think there are people who really enjoy the middle category.

Re: PWP

(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 09:10 pm (UTC)(link)
If a plot revolves around sex but is a plot with character development and all that, then it counts as plot. I would say things like 50 shades of gray have "plot", of whatever quality you deem to give it.

If it's 20k words of "aliens took two of the characters away from all the rest, put them in a cage, and them do it repeatedly over a week with magic sex dust that made them completely OOC," I don't consider that plot, even porny plot. And yes, I've read fics like this.
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: PWP

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-01-31 09:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd agree.

And...wow. How do you put that into 20k words? o__O

Re: PWP

(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 09:26 pm (UTC)(link)
SGA + whump, that's how.
th0rns_n_r0ses: (Default)

Re: PWP

[personal profile] th0rns_n_r0ses 2015-01-31 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I think I read that fic.

Re: PWP

(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)
There was probably 50+ to choose from, really...

Re: PWP

(Anonymous) 2015-02-01 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
Wonderful.
fingalsanteater: (Default)

Re: PWP

[personal profile] fingalsanteater 2015-01-31 09:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree with this definition. I've ready plenty of smut fics that were actually character pieces, so I wouldn't call them PWPs.