[ SECRET POST #2955 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2955 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 014 secrets from Secret Submission Post #422.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

That's actually a big problem, since no one is going to have a flawless record for everything, OP.

[(Anonymous)]

Actually, it's not necessarily a big problem! They didn't say the creator had to have a flawless record. I assume they realize there are levels of "dirt" and aren't going to be turned off something because they found out the creator stole a pack of gum when he was 12.

[(Anonymous)]

I hope you're right, but the secret did say they were easily put off by the actions of the creator, so...

[(Anonymous)]

NA

Eh, I think the word "easily" in that sentence could also mean:

1) I'm put off not just by a creator's actions (e.g. Roman Polanski) but by a creator's words (e.g. Orson Scott Card). (Though, personally, I'd argue that OSC's screeds are at the very least a call to action and that it makes complete sense to be turned off of his works as a result.)

and/or

2) I'm even turned off of what were previously my very favorite works.