[ SECRET POST #2984 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2984 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18. [ SPOILERS for Pitch Black]



__________________________________________________



19. [ SPOILERS for Confessions of an Ugly Stepsister ]



__________________________________________________



20. [ WARNING for incest ]



__________________________________________________



21. [ WARNING for rape ]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #426.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Gamergaters do this pretty much constantly

Everyone doe this constantly. I've seen this more from the aGG side than anywhere else but I'm not going to say "aGG do this constantly" because I'm pretty sure it applies to the worst people across the board.

In fact what you're doing there is judging him, assuming a particular viewpoint of his, without proof, based on nothing more than "Those people always do that"

and

"Also he wouldn't give a shit about Rotterham if the perpetrators weren't Muslim. Not enough of a shit to make videos anyway"

How do you know? What proof, what form from this guy do you have to back that up, other than your bias against anyone calling themselves a GG supporter? "If this was different he wouldn't XYZ" If you don't have the supernatural power to see into XYZ dimension where things are different, you've no business to judge or dismiss someone based on what you believe.

What I can do, is see into this dimension, where aGG, people who claim to be against harassment of women ARE harassing women who don't believe the same things as them. What I can do is see into this dimention, where the only people complaining about Arthur Chu and his horrible rape related shit are the GG side, and the aGG seem to give no fucks (Not enough fucks to make videos anyway).

Assholes on both sides pulling immature shit and arguing from nothing more than their own bias. pick whichever side speaks to you personally, but for fuck sake, don't be one of those assholes. We have enough of those assholes.

[(Anonymous)]

All the proof she needs is that he's a GGer and thus he's evul. But everyone on the aGG side is an innocent flower. She's biased, just in the other direction and any argument she has against GG somehow doesn't count when applied to aGG. It's always the same. The inability to acknowledge both parties are idiots is pretty widespread.

[chardmonster]

I've seen this more from the aGG side than anywhere else

Found the gamergater

How's it feel being a bizarro-universe SJW? Vindicating, right? Floating around in your little yellbubble

I am sick and tired of both sides but Sargon's an idiot and this flaily defense of him is continued proof that you're all a bunch of babies.

[(Anonymous)]

If it's a flaily defence, I would imagine you might have an easy time refuting my points instead of trying ad hominem attacks that don't really work.

Yes, I am a gamergater, I was not dressed in a red and white striped outfit, wearing glasses and blue pants, so finding me was not really the point of this exercise, but good for you all the same. I wouldn't say I'm a social justice warrior but before GG came along it is something that had been levelled at me. Apparently I'm not SJW enough now.

Yes, Sargon is an idiot, but it's nothing to do with GG, and his association with GG does not make him MORE of an idiot.

"and this flaily defense of him is continued proof that you're all a bunch of babies"

No. My 'defence' of anyone flaily, or otherwise, proves nothing about anyone other than myself. You seem to be having a problem with the idea of "one person in a group is not the whole group"

[chardmonster]

If it's a flaily defence, I would imagine you might have an easy time refuting my points instead of trying ad hominem attacks that don't really work.

The funniest part is when people expect you to break down their argument and refute every single bit like it's your homework and posting on a message board is an important part of your day.

[(Anonymous)]

Well, you claim my argument is flaily, and you were very insulting and offensive with no actual provocation (seriously, find the part where I attacked you) so I think you kind of have an obligation to either back up your personal attack, or apologise for it, or admit you're just being unpleasant because you don't know any better way to treat people on-line, or make another snarky comment to prove that you can't be civil.

[chardmonster]

or make another snarky comment to prove that you can't be civil.

Also funny is your particularly pompous manner of writing. Is that how you normally are?

[(Anonymous)]

Ad hominem again.

Ok, so "pompous manner of writing" How is this?

[chardmonster]

So that is how you normally are. Okay.

I'm just noticing that a lot of gamergaters fall back on a sort of pseudointellectualism when they're in arguments. They also tend to think knowing the words "ad hominem" means people are going to take them seriously.

[(Anonymous)]

DA

You do realise that you're doing all the things that you accuse them of, right?

[chardmonster]

Please point out where I'm not talking like a normal person and instead acting like I'm writing a college paper.

[(Anonymous)]

You may mostly not talk like you're writing a college paper, but this whole "holier than thou" attitude and the way you argue reeks of pseudointellectualism as well.

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Writing formally isn't necessarily a sign that someone's trying to look more intelligent. It's often because the person writing doesn't want to be misunderstood. I've noticed it's quite common with people with learning disorders, dyslexia and dyspraxia, and people on the autism spectrum. They're so used to being misunderstood that they craft their posts and comments very carefully, which comes off as formal and stilted to people who haven't grown up with those disorders.

[(Anonymous)]

Ok. You prefer plain speaking. Here you are:

Seriously, What is your problem?

[chardmonster]

My problem is that you're defending bullshit that's making being a video game fan in public difficult for any girl not willing to laugh along with a bunch of douches.

I'm not going to act like this isn't a stupid bullshit thing of you to do just because you asked.

[(Anonymous)]

Except I am not. I'm suggesting you be reasonable and accept that some people are a part of gamergate, care about diversity, care about women in the games industry, but also care about being labelled as being white cis het men who hate women by a media who are using this as a cover for shitty ethical practices.

One of the reasons I care about this is because thanks to this idea of gamergate being malehetroscum people like you can use the existence of scummy misogynist to justify unprovoked attacks on people like me when my comment was only opposing you making hurtful blanket statements and writing of anyone part of a group as as vile as the whole group. In response to this, you feel validated in calling them babies when we happen to not like being attacked.

[(Anonymous)]

Congrats you've turned into Tumblr.

[(Anonymous)]

Either refute their damn arguments or don't pretend to have the moral high ground. Jesus Christ, Chard, you know better than this.

The fact you aren't actually refuting their points tells me you CAN'T.

[chardmonster]

I can't refute their points anymore than I can convince a conspiracy theorist that Kanye West is not the Illuminati.

[(Anonymous)]

No. You can. You just don't want to, so instead you're pitching a damn fit, resorting to calling them names, etc, and making yourself out to be a total asshat.

Don't get into fucking debates if all you're gonna do is call other people names the second you don't want to refute their points.