[ SECRET POST #2988 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2988 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 050 secrets from Secret Submission Post #427.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 2 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

CAn we stop with this insistence that the reviews were horribly harsh and critical and mean?

They were pretty bland reviews. Yeah, a lot of them talked about not getting or liking something, and a lot of them nitpicked grammar, especially when they didn't know the canon well enough to talk about anything else. But they were a long, long way from the rage-y flames people keep painting them as. Mostly they all fell into about what you'd expect from assigned critique: "I liked X. Y needed work. I think your Z is good."

[fingalsanteater]

The one I read was really nitpicky and kind of annoying, but not overly harsh. I would kind of be irritated if I got it, thought, because like I said, I don't care that my writing isn't perfect-- I write for fun. I do like concrit, but only solicited.

[(Anonymous)]

"Kind of annoying" is really the worst that can be said about them. I see people in this thread calling them "harsh flames" and "tearing apart" and I'm just like, did we read the same comments??!

[(Anonymous)]

Agreed. Aside from the troll one that I saw, the initial reviews were politely stated, and included constructive criticism (which is probably the flashpoint), but the criticism was mild, and the author's reaction was over the top.