Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-03-20 07:02 pm
[ SECRET POST #2998 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2998 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

__________________________________________________
23.

__________________________________________________
24.

__________________________________________________
25.

__________________________________________________
26.

__________________________________________________
27. http://i.imgur.com/1PIv5hG.jpg
[Archer, linked for cartoon nudity/sex]
__________________________________________________
28.

__________________________________________________
29.

__________________________________________________
30. [ SPOILERS for Kingsman ]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #428.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 12:06 am (UTC)(link)So yes, they were explicitly asked to go and watch people play who had no idea they were being watched.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 12:13 am (UTC)(link)The class was a bad idea, sure, but the stories weren't private and comments were welcome from the start.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 12:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 12:17 am (UTC)(link)But they were published on a fanfic site, one that allows work to be categorized by the source material its based on. It's not bizarre to imagine that writers would find it strange that people with zero interest in the source would be reading fanfic for that source, and leaving critiques for it.
I don't read and crit fics in fandoms I don't know, do you?
People post all sorts of things online. Should people who post about knitting techniques be completely unsurprised and unaffected if painters came in and said "Hmm, that sweater's made all wrong." Should people who post recipies not wonder what's going on if a bunch of math students came in and started criticizing the way they're using measurements?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 12:27 am (UTC)(link)I already said the class was a bad idea, so your point is...?
Oh, this is the old "only people in fandom can read fics!!!1!!!"
I'm not gonna waste my time again on that.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 12:31 am (UTC)(link)And on the same note, no that's not my point because that would be stupid and facetious. My point is that when you're posting something as specific as a fanfic for a specific fandom on a dedicated fic archive, then you sort of expect that the people who find that work is doing so because they're LOOKING for it, equally specifically. You're not posting it on the front page of Google for every single person who opens up their browser. So when someone who has no interest in the thing you write comes along and decides to tear it up, it's valid to think that's a pretty odd thing to do.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 10:25 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 12:19 am (UTC)(link)I liked someone's rebuttal to this analogy -- it's like putting a small local play on youTube. You expect maybe a dozen people to watch the video, because no one else gives a damn about your play. Then someone random stumbles on it...
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 12:24 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 12:27 am (UTC)(link)All sorts of people who are interested in all sorts of things visit YouTube for a million different reasons.
People go into a specific fandom tag on AO3 looking to read fanfic for that sorce material. So the expectation of the people watching becomes much more specific. Of course anyone who wants to can go to AO3, but why would they? And even fanfic readers don't scour tags for fandoms they don't know a thing about.
The understanding when you post on a site like AO3 is that the people who will seek out and find your fics have already pre-selected and narrowed down their own interests to the point where yes, by that point, you ARE writing for an 'intended' audience.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 12:32 am (UTC)(link)That's pretty much how *I* got into fandom. Better yet, I was searching reviews about a movie I was considering seeing and instead I found fics of it and read them before seeing it.
Now I know I shouldn't have because I wasn't THE INTENDED AUDIENCE.
Can't I blame the authors for not locking their fics so only selected people can read them? Or the archives for being googleables?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 12:38 am (UTC)(link)How is that even remotely comparable.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 12:41 am (UTC)(link)Did you leave immediate critiques for those fics you read when you hadn't seen the movie yet? Would you think it was acceptable for you to do that (yes, yes, we all know you're allowed to) when you had no context in which to place that work or compare it to?
Because that's what was going on here.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 01:08 am (UTC)(link)I didn't comment, because that was back when fic archives weren't a thing. The only way to comment was sending a mail to the author and not all authors posted their mail address for that.
But still, why, exactly (other than those supposed unwritten rules of fandom) would had it be wrong to say "I think ___ was great, but the pacing was weird/there were some typos" or something similar?
Because the comments by those students (even the most "brutal" one) were along those lines and no one mentioned anything that required knowledge of the canon.
Please note that I'm not saying authors should welcome concrit or that all concrit is good (because many times is not).
Also, I know well what is going and I just hate (and disagree with) both trends ("concrit is evil" and "fandom is a private space only for people in fandom") that everyone supports because REASONS.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 01:22 am (UTC)(link)Ignoring the fact that yes you're allowed/entitled to, would you leave that sort of concrit on a fic you read in a fandom you had zero interest in? If you wouldn't, then you need to unpack the reasons why you wouldn't. If you would, then I ask what you'd expect the writer to think? What would YOU think if someone left concrit on a fic you wrote who had just stumbled randomly on your work from Google (or as in this case, was told to do it by their college professor)? How much weight would you assign to their opinion?
And as judgemental, hateful and sometimes downright dangerous as people are over fannish things (especially when fannish things become entangled with RL identities), are you really shocked that some people want to preserve that safe space? Some of the reactions may be extreme, but the motivation behind it isn't particularly hard to understand.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 01:58 am (UTC)(link)Now, I won't do it, but it's just because I don't see the point in commenting about something I'm not invested on.
If someone else wants to do so? That's ok IMO, as long as they aren't rude (no one was in this case) and don't look down on fans or something similar.
"What would YOU think if someone left concrit on a fic you wrote who had just stumbled randomly on your work from Google (or as in this case, was told to do it by their college professor)? How much weight would you assign to their opinion?"
The funny part it's that there's no "would" for me, since I have got concrit from people outside fandom. It would take to long to explain the circumstances that lead to that, but let's just say it wasn't anything as public as in this case.
Anyway, IMO the weight of concrit doesn't comes from the person giving it but by its contents and how it's given.
If something doesn't make sense/is subjective, it's bad concrit and it's pointless to care about it.
If someone is rude, they probably aren't sending concrit but a flame.
If they aren't rude and have a point in there? It doesn't matter if they're BNF, NNF or "outsiders" and in the end I can still choose to ignore that (good) concrit for any reason (like not caring about improving, because that's perfectly ok) or not.
(I do have an emotional reaction to concrit that is not always this calm, but I learned a long time ago to get away from the keyboard at those moments, because after awhile it's obvious is not that big of a deal.
Also, fandom is not and has never been a safe space. Pretending it is, is more damaging that concrit can ever be)
"I'm just saying that there was nothing at all whiny or over-reactionary about people thinking that people who didn't know the canon they were writing about posting crit for it was weird."
And I'm saying it wasn't. We'll probably just have to agree to disagree.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 02:07 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 01:40 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 02:01 am (UTC)(link)It was just my gateway for fandom, so I really wasn't the "intended audience" for that one.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 02:14 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-21 02:24 am (UTC)(link)