case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-04-22 04:29 pm

[ SECRET POST #3031 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3031 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.











Notes:

Going to be a late day, so early secrets!

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 035 secrets from Secret Submission Post #433.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
purpleseas: (Default)

[personal profile] purpleseas 2015-04-23 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
It's important to remake unusual films in order to achieve a uniform standard of blandness. Who can be bothered to watch a scary, crazy, touching, tragic, rage-inducingly effective portrait of high school savagery like Brian De Palma's 1976 Carrie when they can just...sit through a generic "horror" version from 2013 that comes off as a really confused superhero origin story by the end? Weird movies are just too much fun, which is very dangerous. Tone it down, guys, sheesh.

(Anonymous) 2015-04-23 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
This comment is brilliant. TYSM.
chardmonster: (Default)

[personal profile] chardmonster 2015-04-23 12:44 am (UTC)(link)
DOES THIS COUNT IF IT'S A PLAY

BECAUSE

IT'S A PLAY

THE MOVIE IS BASED ON A MUSICAL THAT IS STILL PERFORMED

My Fair Lady, Arsenic and Old Lace, Fiddler on the Roof, Grease

(Anonymous) 2015-04-23 04:23 am (UTC)(link)
These were movies that came from plays and you had better believe people would get upset about remakes of the movies. Certain movie adaptations are iconic and, honestly, a lot more people have probably seen the movie versions.
tabaqui: (Default)

[personal profile] tabaqui 2015-04-23 06:49 am (UTC)(link)
I know i'm late and all but...why do you keep bringing this up? Nobody is talking about remaking the play, but the *movie*, which is probably rather different than the play.

Also, i've never seen the play, and can only imagine Tim Curry in drag as Dr. Furter. So....can you tell me your point? And i'm not trying to be combative or obnoxious, i'm just really confused.