[ SECRET POST #3034 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3034 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 096 secrets from Secret Submission Post #434.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[diet_poison]

I guess you and I had very different interpretations of Philstar's comments.

As for the rest I'm not even trying to have that argument with you, why did you bring all that up exactly?

[herpymcderp]

Well I guess I brought it up because I didn't realize there were two different ways to interpret, "I don't believe misandry exists."

I just wanted to be very clear where I was coming from.

[diet_poison]

I could tell you I believe there is no such thing as a groundhog because the only legitimate term for that animal is "woodchuck".

Seriously, what Philstar was saying isn't that the attitudes you're arguing don't exist; it's that they don't think they can be accurately titled "misandry" and thus, "misandry" does not exist. I'm not saying I agree completely with them, but I think it's pretty obvious that's what they meant. (If I'm wrong, please correct me, Philstar!)

[(Anonymous)]

Doesn't domestic violence towards men count as misandry because of "why they hell you let your bitch go tramp on you, bro?"

[diet_poison]

The issue you're talking about is toxic masculinity's response to domestic violence against men, right?

Anyway, I'm not sure how I'd answer that. I'm arguing with Herpy's interpretation of Philstar's words, and can see both sides of the argument Philstar's making. If I had to give an answer right now, though, to go on a bit of a tangent - that specific issue isn't misandry, no. It's not an attitude that applies to men in general; it's tearing down specific men who don't fit the paradigm of what a man "should be". It's definitely harmful and bad and a result of gender role crap, but I do not think I'd call it misandry, specifically.