Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-05-02 03:17 pm
[ SECRET POST #3041 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3041 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 085 secrets from Secret Submission Post #435.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
But I haven't generally seen anyone say don't write kinks. I've just seen people say realize you're writing kink and let readers know what kink is there so they can avoid it if they want.
no subject
That said, I've been encountering a lot of people lately who say that non- and dub-con are rape apologia, that BDSM is inherently harmful, and etc etc. I didn't see nearly so much of that a few years ago.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 03:35 am (UTC)(link)And the correct response to this is to go to the writer in question, and tell them why you think it is non-con and politely ask that they warn for it. You should assume ignorance, not malice, because for often than not that is the case. And the answer to ignorance is education, not attacks.
But the problem is it's become not about warning now, it's become about it existing period end of store. The very existence of this kind of fic, properly tagged and warned for, now apparently causes rape culture. Which is just fucking stupid. (And yes, this is exactly what people are saying in that stupid neverending Sherlock wank.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 01:18 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 09:30 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 05:46 pm (UTC)(link)Tagging is wonderfully easy to use, which means in some cases it's better not to.
no subject
I'm not sure I would say fandom as a whole is anti-kink, but there is a distinct vocal minority who are abusive and toxic, and they are loud enough to seem like there are more of them than there actually are. It's kinda like the Westboro Baptist Church, in a way. They do nasty things to provoke a reaction, then portray the other person as being the bad guy for having a reaction, and often doing so under the guise of social justice; then because they provoked a reaction, they feel completely justified in doing things to further hurt people. Unlike the WBC, there aren't lawsuits involved, but the harassment, abuse, and threats (sometimes of doxxing; there have been instances where fic writers have been doxxed and had people calling their workplace to try to get them fired for writing "unacceptable" kinks) are most certainly real.
It has a chilling effect on certain areas of fandom, because people see this going on and worry that if they post their own fics or even admit to liking fics with certain kinks (dub/noncon seem to be the most frequent magnet for this, but I'm sure there are others), they'll be next. It's a problem, but it's easy to miss because it really is a minority pulling this shit.
I wish it were only people asking for trigger warnings; that's fine. What this minority are doing is not.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 04:27 pm (UTC)(link)This, basically. Dubcon/noncon and underage are the ones most frequently targeted, but I've also seen people going after BDSM in general and femsub in particular. Often while kinking on some pretty skeevy and disturbing things themselves, but it's OK because they're doing it the "right" way.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 05:51 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 05:47 pm (UTC)(link)