case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-05-04 06:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #3043 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3043 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[Blake's 7]


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 056 secrets from Secret Submission Post #435.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Texas shooting: Two gunmen shot dead outside Muhammad exhibition

(Anonymous) 2015-05-04 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
The convention was begging for an attack, the cops should have obliged them and arrested the attackers afterwards. Freedom of speech should come with freedom to take the consequences.

Re: Texas shooting: Two gunmen shot dead outside Muhammad exhibition

(Anonymous) 2015-05-04 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
What the fuck kind of understanding of law and justice and right do you have where you can sustain this kind of view

The consequences here were against the law. Violence is not a form of fucking protected speech. It's fucking idiotic, not to mention the bizareness of the motives that lead you to neglect this incredibly basic point. God I don't understand how this argument has any currency whatsoever on the Internet.

Unless you're literally an anarchist, your position is radically untenable.

Re: Texas shooting: Two gunmen shot dead outside Muhammad exhibition

(Anonymous) 2015-05-04 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)
When a bunch of people go out of their way to provoke violence, I have no problem waiting to arrest the people who they were provoking until they've finished. The people who resorted to violence go to jail or to the grave, and the people who provoked it get a lesson in thinking through what provoking violence actually means. Win-win.
insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

Re: Texas shooting: Two gunmen shot dead outside Muhammad exhibition

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2015-05-05 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
Good luck drawing a line with that one that doesn't get you punched in the face as a counterpoint, cause what disagreement can't provoke violence?

Re: Texas shooting: Two gunmen shot dead outside Muhammad exhibition

(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
I can draw a line. The Mason-Dixon one. Anyone south of it is in trouble.

Re: Texas shooting: Two gunmen shot dead outside Muhammad exhibition

(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
Now this I can get behind.

Re: Texas shooting: Two gunmen shot dead outside Muhammad exhibition

(Anonymous) 2015-05-04 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Does the same thing go for the congresswoman who got shot some years ago? Or MLK for that matter? Maybe they should have just shut up, because there were people out there who didn't like their political opinions.

You don't get to shoot anyone just because they say or draw something you don't like.

Re: Texas shooting: Two gunmen shot dead outside Muhammad exhibition

(Anonymous) 2015-05-04 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)
They all put their heads above the parapet, you know the origin of the phrase? Well, there you go. It is a risk you tale when you do that.

Re: Texas shooting: Two gunmen shot dead outside Muhammad exhibition

(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 03:52 am (UTC)(link)
I'm deciding that you're begging for a punch in the face. So should punch you in the face. Freedom of speech should come with freedom to take the consequences ;)

Re: Texas shooting: Two gunmen shot dead outside Muhammad exhibition

(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 05:08 am (UTC)(link)
If a couple of fundie Christians had gunned down a Gay parade, I doubt you'd be saying they were "begging for an attack".

Homosexuality IS against christianity, after all, as much as drawing Mohammed is against islam.

Having an entire half-naked parade of gays is just PROVOKING for an attack, hmmm?

Re: Texas shooting: Two gunmen shot dead outside Muhammad exhibition

(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 11:46 am (UTC)(link)
lol you know that's not the same at all but ok

Re: Texas shooting: Two gunmen shot dead outside Muhammad exhibition

(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 03:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah it's not the same, the difference is the worst thing crazy christians will do is make an anti-protest, not fucking gun them down.

Re: Texas shooting: Two gunmen shot dead outside Muhammad exhibition

(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 03:58 pm (UTC)(link)
some crazy christians WILL gun people down. it's happened before.

Re: Texas shooting: Two gunmen shot dead outside Muhammad exhibition

(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 07:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Here's the reality: South Park can have long scenes of Jesus getting fisted by Satan while Mary is menstruating on them both.

But cannot have Mohammed appear for 1 second without him doing a thing.

Notice the difference.

Re: Texas shooting: Two gunmen shot dead outside Muhammad exhibition

(Anonymous) 2015-05-07 05:36 am (UTC)(link)
And thats why i don't watch south park. And why is it that satire show use kids as main character?

Coward, much?

Re: Texas shooting: Two gunmen shot dead outside Muhammad exhibition

(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 05:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah gay parades with signs saying things like "every time you see a rainbow God is having gay sex" is NOT PROVOKING CHRISTIANS AT ALL