Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-05-04 06:59 pm
[ SECRET POST #3043 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3043 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

[Blake's 7]
__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 056 secrets from Secret Submission Post #435.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 12:07 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
I'm kind of tired tonight, it'd be nice if people gave it a rest. I doubt it'll happen, though.
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 12:12 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 12:13 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 12:13 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
I don't think all anons are always the same anon, but in that specific instance I believed that those two in particular being referenced, were! I might be wrong! There's no way to prove either one retrospectively, really.
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 12:23 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 12:24 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 12:25 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 12:28 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 12:29 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 12:26 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 12:27 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 12:29 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
As for your serious request, though - no. It's often a legit accusation, plus anon can accuse all users of also being socks of the same person, as has been proven repeatedly in this post.
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 12:33 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 12:43 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
As is, I've outlined the reasons above why assuming anons are the same anon won't be a delete/freeze/ban/etc-able thing, and I don't have much further to say on that.
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 12:57 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
I don't think I've ever made fun of anons for being anon. Maybe you're thinking of some other highly intelligent, witty, handsome guy with a giant dick.
(frozen comment) (no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-05 01:03 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) (no subject)
(frozen comment) (no subject)
(frozen comment) (no subject)
(frozen comment) (no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-05 01:12 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) (no subject)
(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) no subject
--Sneak