fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #3045 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3045 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

__________________________________________________

14.

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 028 secrets from Secret Submission Post #435.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Mm, this sounds dangerously like "marriage is intended for natural procreation", because the lack of partner+partner procreation (not even taking adoption or IVF into account) is literally the only thing that differentiates gay from straight marriage. I'm not touching the word "unnatural", because homosexuality is visible (and often a legitimate partnering/family setup) in literally hundreds of species in the world, so...yeah.

But going back to the "marriage = man+woman=child", like...okay, so do straight, infertile people not get to get married? Do elderly straight couples not get to get married?

Face it. The only reason to not support gay marriage is because, underneath everything, you honestly don't believe that they deserve the same rights as straight people. That's it.

[ SECRET POST #3045 ]

Re: Myabe just maybe...