[ SECRET POST #3045 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3045 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 028 secrets from Secret Submission Post #435.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

but... isn't that #2 exactly the same as all that over-sensitivity about whether people apply trigger warnings? The only difference, really, is that they use that "the good old times" rhetoric.
(To illustrate: I had someone loudly complain about how they dared put sexual assault in sons of anarchy. Now THATs not even "You can't judge a book by its cover anymore!" but another level entirely. Like "I can't trust a story to be a safe space when it all but screams at me that it's not! Mememe!")

[solarbird]

And if Brad Torgersen himself was not specifically on the record saying that "safe spaces" and trigger-warnings were bullshit and people should suck it up and deal, then maybe, just maybe, one could present that argument with a straight face.

But he is. So you can't.