[ SECRET POST #3049 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3049 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 047 secrets from Secret Submission Post #436.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: why is f!s so bad at detecting bait?

[(Anonymous)]

I have to say I only understood the last line. The rest of this post struck me as little more than word salad.

Re: why is f!s so bad at detecting bait?

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT is saying that f!s 'fell for' 3 out of 3 troll attempts that were posted tonight. That's surprising to OP, because the qualities that they list usually indicate that a community will be good at recognizing trolls.

Re: why is f!s so bad at detecting bait?

[(Anonymous)]

And which of the secrets are bait, exactly? I looked at them, and nothing stood out to me.

Re: why is f!s so bad at detecting bait?

[(Anonymous)]

Pretty sure it's stuff in gencom, not secrets.

Re: why is f!s so bad at detecting bait?

[(Anonymous)]

...I have to admit I didn't get that from the OP. Then again, it struck me as word salad thanks to the formatting/grammar. It took a lot for me to even understand part of what was said.

Re: why is f!s so bad at detecting bait?

[(Anonymous)]

I'm with you. It doesn't make sense to me, either. I mean, I think that they're implying we fell for 3 troll threads, but I don't see anything that could be trolls so I don't know what they're talking about.

Re: why is f!s so bad at detecting bait?

[(Anonymous)]

Gamergate's clearly a troll, and asexuality in the TMI.

Not sure what the third one would be.

Re: why is f!s so bad at detecting bait?

[(Anonymous)]

Ah. I tend to skip over anything gamer related since I'm not into gaming, but how is the asexuality thing trollish? The OP posted their issue, people are saying "hey, maybe you're asexual", OP is like "yeah, I know that's a thing but I'm not sure if I am or not" and...that's it? There's not really any wank or drama over it. Just mentioning the word asexuality isn't automatically trolling in itself.

Re: why is f!s so bad at detecting bait?

[(Anonymous)]

DA

The fact that OP has no answers to legitimate questions, doesn't actually address any of the suggestions or advice, and doesn't seem to have all their story together would suggest troll.

Re: why is f!s so bad at detecting bait?

[(Anonymous)]

nyart

Really? They seem more unsure than anything else.

Re: why is f!s so bad at detecting bait?

[(Anonymous)]

yep.

that and the classic "i wish i could just be normal!" bait that, thankfully, no one took.

Re: why is f!s so bad at detecting bait?

[(Anonymous)]

nayrt

that and the classic "i wish i could just be normal!" bait that, thankfully, no one took.

Maybe I'm missing something, but how is that bait? "I wish I could just be normal!" is something I've thought many, many times and I definitely would feel that way if I was in the situation OP is. I mean, it COULD be a troll, but it doesn't seem out of the realm of possibility that it could be real.