[ SECRET POST #3053 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3053 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[The Kid (Charlie Chaplin)/Starsky & Hutch ("Gillian")]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Network]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Sci-Fi/Fantasy]


__________________________________________________



05.
[In Plain Sight]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Captain America: Civil War]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Samurai Warriors]


__________________________________________________



08. https://i.imgur.com/Tr3NZUD.jpg
[NSFW image (shirtless 16 year old? girl), discussion of underage sexuality]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Joss Whedon]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 011 secrets from Secret Submission Post #436.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

(frozen comment)

[blitzwing]

Boobs and dicks aren't comparable. It's never legal to have your dick out in public, afaik. Breasts are legal to show in public. Would you ever put a photo of a man's bare chest behind a cut, simply because of his chest? No, so why put a woman's chest behind a cut?

(frozen comment)

[case]

The point is the character (and possibly actress) is 16.

(And exposed breasts are not actually legal in all places.)

(frozen comment)

[blitzwing]

But you don't put every character/acress who's under 16 behind a cut. You wouldn't put a character/actress under a cut for showing her bare arms. Likewise, it shouldn't be cut for showing bare breasts.

(frozen comment)

[case]

Not every character/actress under 16 is being directly sexualized by the context. In this movie, in this scene, in this secret, there is sexualization going on (OP even wanted the underage sexuality thing mentioned). Context matters!

If it were a picture of breastfeeding, it probably wouldn't be linked.

Like I said: it depends!

(frozen comment)

[blitzwing]

Thank you for explaining your reasoning, and for listening to my concerns/opinions on the matter. I respect that it's your call to make.

(frozen comment)

[case]

No problem! People have asked before.

It's more about how much the subject matter is being sexualized, than how much nudity there is! I mean if it's a giant close up of a vagina yeah maybe that's a bit much but like someone just happens to be nude or have a butt or boob out? Not really a problem unless they're you know, underage or the picture is meant to be sexual. A picture of a 16 year old posing nude in a window in a movie where she is supposed to be sexual wouldn't be in the same ballpark at all as picture of like, a random 40-y/o woman who is sunbathing topless.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

It's legal to have your dick out in LOTS of places. "Indecent exposure" is not actually illegal in many, many, many jurisdictions. Here in Portland we host the World Naked Bike Ride every year, for example.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Meh, that doesn't mean it's legal in Portland, just that police turn a blind eye for a particular event.

(frozen comment)

[blitzwing]

I stand corrected. The point is, breasts are being unnecessarily sexualized. A man's chest wouldn't be behind a cut, so there's no reason for a woman's to be.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

unfortunately, we live in an unenlightened world, and breasts are in fact nsfw

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Breasts aren't "unnecessarily sexualized," they are, in fact, evolved to attract sexual advances. If they weren't, we human females would just have wee tiny nipples like the rest of mammal creation, instead of flaunting these secondary sexual characteristics around 24/7.

That said, sexualized shouldn't equal demonized, and I sure do wish I could go topless at times.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Animals kept for dairy have giant nipples too! Maybe we were just bred as dairy creatures by aliens for a while until they found better sources of food.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Ah, so all the countries that don't consider naked boobs 'adults' are unevolved. Gotcha.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Oh for goodness' sake, stop looking for offence. You know perfectly well what they meant.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Eh, there's a trend of nipple-less dudes in some media too. I'd rather both genders have to wear shirts than neither having to.

(frozen comment)

[blitzwing]

Shame on you nonny. Boobs are meant to be free.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

BOOB!!!BOOBIES EVERYWHERE!!

(frozen comment)

[herpymcderp]

Depending on where you live, exposure of the female torso might be legal (guess what, it's not legal everywhere in the world and this is the internet), but regardless of legalities you're going to get in some serious trouble if you're looking at boobs at work.

That is why it is NSFW and linked.

Don't be that guy, blitz.

(frozen comment)

[blitzwing]

The guy who wants equal rights for men and women? Everyone should be able to go topless!

you're going to get in some serious trouble if you're looking at boobs at work.

Well I wouldn't. They know they'd get an endless harangue about how sexualizing women's chests is wrong.

(frozen comment)

[herpymcderp]

Sorry but reality is reality: people lose their jobs for even accidentally clicking on topless pics of women at work.

(frozen comment)

[blitzwing]

That happens on several different grounds. One is the argument that it creates a hostile workplace/harassment.

The other has to do with violating your company's tech TOS/policies. You should probably either not sign such a policy, or bring a data stick/data plan to use your own internet, removing the risk of such a violation.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

This is a daft response. Data sticks are not allowed in my workplace, and I don't have a job if I don't sign the IT policy (and that is true of every workplace where I could use my skills, as it potentially compromises service user data privacy). Simple.

I'm sure you will come back with some clever riposte, but you are wrong. Nudity is NSFW, Deal with it.

(frozen comment)

[blitzwing]

Are you not allowed to bring phones to work either? The data stick is just a tip for those who can do it. Since the image in question is neither pornographic nor obscene, it doesn't even violate most workforce TOS/policies.

Nudity is NSFW, Deal with it.

If it's workplace appropriate, it is defacto not NSFW. Guess you'll have to deal with that.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

I agree with you. In our national television, boobs are more like a PG-13 thing...