[ SECRET POST #3053 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3053 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[The Kid (Charlie Chaplin)/Starsky & Hutch ("Gillian")]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Network]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Sci-Fi/Fantasy]


__________________________________________________



05.
[In Plain Sight]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Captain America: Civil War]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Samurai Warriors]


__________________________________________________



08. https://i.imgur.com/Tr3NZUD.jpg
[NSFW image (shirtless 16 year old? girl), discussion of underage sexuality]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Joss Whedon]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 011 secrets from Secret Submission Post #436.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

(frozen comment)

[caerbannog]

I check FS on my breaks I can assure you both man and female breasts are not something id want on my screen! Especially underage!

I do agree breasts are over sexualised but I also like not getting frowned at at work. Or fired. Probably just warned really but it wouldn't look good.

(frozen comment)

[blitzwing]

I check FS on my breaks I can assure you both man and female breasts are not something id want on my screen! Especially underage!

The issue is bare man chest gets shown on FS. I seem to recall bare Teen Wolf man chests too, and I think (fandom osmosis) that most of the characters on that are underage? It's a double standard.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

It's a double standard that society perpetuates. It's not a double standard that Case created, or that I created, or that Caerbannog created. Caerbannog's bosses, and my bosses, don't care about bare man chest and they do care about bare women chest. That's unfair, yes, but I don't particularly care to be forced to make a stand for your principles when it might get me disciplined at work.

(frozen comment)

[blitzwing]

So you don't care to take a stand for the equal rights of women? Well that is your choice.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

This is really the hill you think people should die on?

(frozen comment)

[blitzwing]

It's the hill with equality. And titties.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

DA

You're not making a very good case for womens' chests being nonsexual with the glee you're showing about being able to see "titties"

Equality is not on us as viewers to desexualize womens' chests; it's on the creators of the content to display womens' chests in a nonsexual manner equal to mens' chests, which neither the OP nor the creator of the original canon that OP is showing an image from, has done.

Are all images of womens' chests sexual? No.
Is this one? Yes.

I know you hate to admit you're wrong, but have you seen the movie that is being referenced? The scene in the image is intended to be sexual so your arguments about how this particular image is not sexual, have 0 ground here

(frozen comment)

[blitzwing]

have you seen the movie that is being referenced? The scene in the image is intended to be sexual so your arguments about how this particular image is not sexual, have 0 ground here

I have not seen the movie in question (no clue what movie it is) but the image itself is not sexual. It has to be watched in a movie, in context, for it to be sexual. "it's sexual in context, so block it!" it not a very practical cry. Feet, hair, necks, stomachs, can be sexual in context, but they don't get banned from sight.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

You can't seriously be that stupid.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Nah. If female's boob being desexualized, the only thing that kept male sexual drive moving is baby making.

Either that or we all became zombies.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Quote
Are all images of womens' chests sexual? No.
Is this one? Yes.

damn you stupid fuck.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

You went there. Well. Yes, this is about equal rights and not your ego. Sure.

(frozen comment)

[blitzwing]

I really don't see how it pertains to my ego?

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Of course you don't.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

That'd be because it's so enormous you have a hard time seeing much of anything past it.

(frozen comment)

[caerbannog]

Oh it's totally a double standard and I don't mind it being fought, but id rather FS not be the place to fight for it until it becomes more acceptable in the work place.

Topless man? Probably a frowny face unless I scroll fast enough. Topless woman? Oooh boy. Probably a sexual harassment class actually.

Tldr currently not approved in the workplace and while in the workplace I try to abide by workplace rules cause I like being employed and getting along with ppl.


Eta. And just in general id prefer secrets of sexualised children of either she under cut so I don't see it. Even if you need movie context to know it's such. Also It's kinda illegal here. Even cartoon children. So if it's under a link in good to go and can ignore it but if it's not linked? Eh risky and I have some moral objections.

However if FS decides to have a NSFW not linked Saturday I won't mind.